CAB420, Machine Learning, Semester 1, 2021
This document sets out the two (2) questions you are to complete for CAB420 Assignment
1A. The assignment is worth 8% of the overall subject grade. All questions are weighted
equally. Students are to work either individually, or in groups of two. Students should submit
their answers in a single document (either a PDF or word document), and upload this to
TurnItIn. If students work in a group of two, only one student should submit a copy of the
report and both student names should be clearly written on the first page of the submission.
1. Data required for this assessment is available on blackboard alongside this document
in CAB420_Assessment_1A_Data.zip. Please refer to individual questions regarding
which data to use for which question.
2. Answers should be submitted via the TurnItIn submission system, linked to on Black-
board. In the event that TurnItIn is down, or you are unable to submit via TurnItIn,
please email your responses to email@example.com.
3. For each question, a short written response (approximately 2-4 pages depending on the
nature of the question, approach taken, and number of figures included) is expected.
This response should explain and justify the approach taken to address the question
(including, if relevant, why the approach was selected over other possible methods),
and include results, relevant figures, and analysis.
4. MATLAB or Python code, including live scripts or notebooks (or equivalent mate-
rials for other languages) may optionally be included as appendices. Figures and
outputs/results that are critical to question answers should be included in
the main question response, and not appear only in an appendix. Note that
MATLAB Live Scipts, Python Notebooks, or similar materials will not on their own
constitute a valid submission and a written response per question is expected as noted
5. Students who require an extension should lodge their extension application with HiQ
(see http://external-apps.qut.edu.au/studentservices/concession/). Please
note that teaching staff (including the unit coordinator) cannot grant extensions.
Problem 1. Regression. The data in Q1/communities.csv contains socio-economic data
from the 1990 US census for various US communities, and the number of violent crimes per
capita (in the column ViolentCrimesPerPop). The purpose of the data is to explore the
link between the various socio-economic factors and crime.
Given the provided data, you are to:
• Split the data into training, validation and testing sets.
• Train a linear regression model to predict the number of violent crimes per captia from
the socio-economic data.
• Train a LASSO regression model to predict the number of violent crimes per captia
from the socio-economic data.
• Train a Ridge regression model to predict the number of violent crimes per captia from
the socio-economic data.
For your analysis, you should disregard the first five columns (state, county, community,
communityname string and fold). Note that the provided data may also contain missing
values, and may need to be sanitized in some way prior to model development.
For LASSO and Ridge models, the validation dataset should be used to select the optimal
value of λ. The performance of all models should be compared on the separate test set, and
should consider the predictive power of the model, the model complexity, and the model
Your final response should include:
• Discussion of how the data is handled, including any data cleaning or removal, and
how the data is split into training, validation and testing.
• Details of the three trained models, including details such as values for λ for the LASSO
and Ridge models, and a discussion of how these were selected.
• An evaluation comparing the three models, considering model accuracy and model
Problem 2. Classification. Land use classification is an important task to understand
our changing environment. One approach to this involves the use of data from aerial sensors
that captures different spectral reflectance properties of the ground below. From this data,
the land type can be classified.
You have been provided with training and testing data (Q2/training.csv and Q2/testing.csv)
that include 27 spectral properties and an overall classification of land type, which can be
• s: ‘Sugi’ forest;
• h: ‘Hinoki’ forest;
• d: ‘Mixed deciduous’ forest;
• o: ‘Other’ non-forest land.
You are to use the provided training set as-is, and split the provided test data (Q2/testing.csv)
into validation and testing sets.
Using this data you are to train three multi-class classifiers to classify land type from the
spectral data. These classifiers are to be:
1. A K-Nearest Neighbours Classifier;
2. A Random Forest; and
3. An ensemble of Support Vector Machines.
Model hyper-parameters should be selected using the validation set you create by splitting
the provided test data. Note that using random automatic hyper-parameter optimization
is not an acceptable way to choose hyper-parameters for this question. Instead you should
perform a series of evaluations or a grid-search with a clear rationale to evaluate and select
appropriate parameters. The resultant models are to be evaluated on the testing set and
Your answer to this question should include:
• Details on how the data was split into training, validation and testing sets.
• Details of hyper-parameter selection, including justification for the approach taken and
any intermediate results that led to the final models.
• An evaluation and comparison of the final three models, including a discussion explor-
ing any difference in performance between the models. This should also highlight any
major differences in the models in terms of classification performance or capabilities.