RAD3004: Assessment Criteria for Neuroimaging Case Study – Questions and Answers
Student name:
Student ID number:
Assessment Criteria for Questions (5% weighting)
Criterion Fail
(<50%)
Pass
(50-59%)
Credit
(60-69%)
Distinction
(70-79%)
High distinction
(80-100%)
Marks
Quality of
questions
No relevant
questions posted
Or closed questions
Or most questions
require a few words
or very basic
responses
Or a single basic
question or two
Questions relevant
to the presentation
but generally simple
Or questions
generally need a few
words or sentences
to answer
Or three basic
questions
All questions
relevant to the
presentation
Questions generally
need more than few
words or a few
sentences to answer
Or three suitable
questions
Each question is
relevant and thoughtful
Each question generally
needs careful thinking
to answer
Or three questions
directly relevant to the
topic of the presentation
Each question is well-
thought off and insightful
Each question demands
detailed explanation or
more than a few
sentences to answer
Or three insightful
questions
/10
Indication of
understanding
of the contents
of the unit
Questions indicate
little or no
understanding of the
contents of the unit
Questions indicate a
limited
understanding of the
contents of the unit
but several
misunderstood
points
Questions indicate a
general
understanding of the
contents of the unit
but some
misunderstood
points
Questions indicate a
higher-level
understanding of the
contents of the unit but
a few misunderstood
points
Questions indicate a
thorough and in-depth
understanding of the
contents of the unit
/10
Total
/20
Overall Comments for Questions
Assessment Criteria for Answers (10 % weighting)
Criterion Fail
(<50%)
Pass
(50-59%)
Credit
(60-69%)
Distinction
(70-79%)
High distinction
(80-100%)
Marks
Quality of
answers
No response to
any of the
questions
Or no effective
answers to any of
the questions
Appropriate or
correct
terminologies are
rarely used or not
used at all
No or minimal
references in the
responses
Attempt to address
all three questions
Can answer basic
questions but
struggle with more
complex concepts or
questions
Appropriate
terminologies are
occasionally used
but missing at many
places
References are
missing for many
sources of
information where
required
All questions are
answered but not in
sufficient level of
details or explanation
Or can answer some
questions; Answers
mostly repeat what
has already been said
without rephrasing or
additional
components to the
presentation
Appropriate
terminologies are
missing at some
places
References needed at
places where required
All questions are
addressed well overall
Or can answer most
questions but a few
arguments need
better support or
explanation
Provides new
information where
relevant
Appropriate
terminologies are
used in general with a
few exceptions
References are
missing for a few
sources of information
where required
Can answer all questions
thoroughly
Detailed explanation is
provided.
Additional insight into the
case or themes discussed.
Arguments are solid and
well-thought off.
Arguments are supported
by references to the
literature.
Appropriate terminologies
are used consistently
References are provided
where appropriate and
required.
/10
Indication of
understanding
of the
contents of
the unit
Answers indicate
little or no
understanding of
the contents of the
unit overall
Answers indicate a
limited
understanding of the
contents of the unit
overall but several
misunderstood
points which include
some key concepts
Answers indicate an
overall general
understanding of the
contents of the unit
overall but some
misunderstood points
which include a few
key concepts
Answers indicate a
good understanding of
the contents of the
unit overall including
key concepts but a
few misunderstood
points
Answers indicate a
thorough and in-depth
understanding of the
contents of the unit
/10
Total
/20
Overall Comments for Answers