DPBS 1190 Assessment 4 Marking
Rubrics
Criteria &
Weight
Fail (0%
- 49%)
Pass (50%
- 64%)
Credit
(65%-74%)
Distinction
(75%-84%)
High Distinction
(85% - 100%)
Presenting
individual
contribution to
the group
work, along
with clearly
establishing
the context and
business issue
relating to the
data analysis
done in the
group project
(70%)
▪ No logic between
business issues,
analytical
techniques, and
overall context of
the project.
▪ The presentation
does not follow a
logical and
coherent analysis
▪ Key messages
are not
communicated.
▪ Attempt to present a
logic between
business issues,
analytical
techniques, and the
context of the
project, but the logic
is not coherent or
clear.
▪ The presentation
provides a
commentary without
key messages linked
with the context
adequately.
▪ Attempt to present a
logic between
business issues,
analytical
techniques, and the
context of the
project.
▪ The presentation
provides a good
commentary and
effort made to
reasonably link the
key messages with
the analysis focusing
on the context.
▪ Explicitly present a
logic between
business issues,
analytical techniques,
and the context of
the project.
▪ The presentation
provides well-
articulated
commentary and a
clear linkage is
established between
key messages and
analytics solution
focusing on the
context.
▪ Explicitly present a
coherent and clear
logic between
business issues,
analytical techniques,
and the context of the
project indicating
options for strategic
policy options for the
business case in
question.
▪ Justifications and
arguments are sound
and convincing.
▪ The presentation
provides thoroughly
well-articulated
commentary and a
clear linkage is
established between
key messages and
analytics solution
with a focus on
strategic policy
options clearly
relating with the
context.
Criteria &
Weight
Fail
(0% - 49%)
Pass
(50% - 64%)
Credit
(65%-74%)
Distinction
(75%-84%)
High Distinction
(85% - 100%)
Communication
and Organization of
Presentation
(30%)
▪ Your presentation
is not in both
audio and video
format.
▪ Your
presentation
does not
indicate a
logic/flow
between each
section.
▪ Poor or unclear
structure.
▪ Your presentation
is in both audio and
video format.
▪ Some attempt has
been made to use a
professional tone in
presentation but not
well-articulated
analysis is
presented.
▪ You have
endeavored to
provide logic/flow
between each
section.
▪ Attempt to a good
structure but lack
of coherently
presenting key
messages.
▪ Your presentation
is in both audio and
video format.
▪ Your presentation
is mostly
professional in tone
but there are gaps
in linking the
presentation with
analysis.
▪ Your presentation
provides an
adequate indication
of the logic/flow
between each
section.
▪ Good structure with
outlining key
messages.
▪ Your presentation
is in both audio and
video format.
▪ Your presentation
is professional in
tone and you
demonstrate your
ability in linking the
key messages with
analytics solution.
▪ Your presentation
p r o v i d e s a
strong indication of
the logic/flow
between each
section.
▪ Good structure
with coherently
presenting key
messages.
▪ Your presentation is
in both audio and
video format.
▪ Your presentation
provides a strong
and coherent
indication of the
logic/flow between
each section.
▪ You have clearly
outlined key
arguments and
logic between each
section and
presented a
thorough analysis
of key issues
linking with
analytics solutions.
▪ Good structure with
high level of
coherent
presentation of key
messages.