MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 3 Page 1 of 4
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MGT601 Dynamic Leadership
Assessment Assessment 3: Video Report in 3 parts
Individual/Group Individual
Length Approx. 9 mins in total
Learning Outcomes a) Explore and reflect on self- development as a leader to
build self-awareness.
b) Through critical reflection on key leadership theories
develop a personal leadership development strategy.
c) Analyse and develop the capacity to influence, motivate
and inspire others in your workplace and/or community
organisations.
e) Demonstrate the technique of reflective and reflexive
practice as a means of continuous learning and self-
development.
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday at end of Module 6 .1
(Week 11). The submission must be a video file uploaded
either to Blackboard or as an unlisted video to YouTube.
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 40 marks
Task
In this assessment task you will create a video outlining the value this subject has added to your
understanding of your leadership future. The video is to be presented by you, without reading from
notes in any way. Your video may include and be supported by any other approach you choose.
The emphasis here is on coherent communication in a way that is professional and impactful.
Students will receive marks for depth of reflection, integration of theory from the subject, quality of
video and audio and attention to the detail. The video should be between 7 and 10 minutes long and
respond to the following three topics:
(1) What the leadership theory discussed in this subject taught me about myself? (approx. 2-3
minutes)
(2) Two scenarios about the future I may face (approx. 3 minutes)
(3) What parts of the subject have I used in planning my path forward? (approx. 3 minutes)
MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 3 Page 2 of 4
These parts can be recorded separately and combined in a final edit, although there is no
compulsion to do so. The important thing here is that your discussion reflects the topics covered in
this subject and demonstrates a high degree of communication.
While there is some overlap between this assessment and previous ones, it is expected that students
convey a more heightened sense of self-awareness and understanding, and to demonstrate that
their appreciation of the key topic areas of this course has matured over the course of this subject.
Simply restating discussion from previous assessments is insufficient for this task.
A full reference list to be provided at the end of the video.
A reminder: students are not to read from notes or a script when presenting.
MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 3 Page 3 of 4
Assessment Rubric: Video report in 3 parts (Approx. 9 mins total)
Criteria
High Distinction
(85% and above)
Distinction
(75% - 84%)
Credit
(65% - 74%)
Pass
(50 – 64%)
Unsatisfactory
(0 – 49%)
Depth of reflection
(35%)
Reflects deeply and
insightfully on
leadership theory and
personal growth
Provides some
insightful reflections,
but lacks depth
Provides some
reflections, but lacks
insight and depth
Minimal or no
reflection provided
No reflection provided
Integration of theory
(25%)
Integrates theoretical
concepts and ideas
effectively into
reflections and
discussion
Integrates some
theoretical concepts,
but not effectively
Integrates few
theoretical concepts,
or not effectively
Minimal or no
integration of theory
No integration of
theory
Quality of video and
audio
(20%)
Video is clear, well-lit,
and audio is clear and
easily audible
Video and audio
quality is good, but
some issues with
clarity or audibility
Video and audio
quality is fair, with
multiple issues
affecting clarity or
audibility
Video and audio
quality is poor, with
many issues affecting
clarity or audibility
Video and audio
quality is
unacceptable, making
it impossible to
understand the
content
MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 3 Page 4 of 4
Criteria
High Distinction
(85% and above)
Distinction
(75% - 84%)
Credit
(65% - 74%)
Pass
(50 – 64%)
Unsatisfactory
(0 – 49%)
Impactful
communication
(20%)
Communicates in a
clear, professional, and
impactful manner
Communicates
effectively, but with
some issues affecting
clarity or impact
Communicates
somewhat effectively,
but lacks clarity or
impact
Communicates poorly,
with little clarity or
impact
Communication is
unacceptable, making
it impossible to
understand the
content