Management School - Undergraduate Coursework Specification

Module Code: MGT310                                                                Coursework Code

Module Title: Critical perspectives on work and organizational psychology

Date Available:

Submission details: 16* January, 2024, 12pm (noon)

Electronic submission only through Blackboard

Students should note that the time of submission is taken from once the document has been successfully uploaded and confirmed this may take more than five minutes during busy periods. Late penalties will be applied to any work submitted from 12.01 pm on 16* January, 2024 onwards. Details of how to calculate a late penalty can be found in the UG Handbook. It is the student's responsibility to ensure the document file has uploaded successfully

When submitting students must:

1. Include a completed cover sheet (available from Blackboard)

2. Use 'Student Number, MGTXXX-I* (c.g. 150011001. MGT310, Assignment 2) as the document's file name and also as the Assignment Title in Turnitin.

3. You can submit your assignment multiple times to the submission link on the module Blackboard site. Each time you submit you will receive a Similarity Report. You can check this and improve your referencing before the final deadline.

After 3 submissions you will need to wait 24hrs before you receive a new report.

Please note: each new submission replaces any previous submission. It is not possible to retrieve a previous submission.

Your final submission must be made before the deadline to avoid late penalties.

Students who do not comply with the Turntin requirements will face a penalty of a 5 mark reduction.

Contribution to Final Mark for Module: 80%

Maximum Word Length: 3500 (excluding references)

Unless otherwe specified, the word count is for the man body of the text and ignores the refcrence list and appendices. If you exceed the word length you will be penalisod. For detais see the Management School Handbooks

Requirements:

Answer the following questions:

1) Critically evaluate the claims made for the eflicacy of Al use in developing screening criteria for recruitment purposes

2) Critically evaluate an employee wellbeing initiative of your choice