MGTS7603 Strategic Human Resources Management – Semester 1, 2024 Assessment 1: Critique of SHRM Frameworks
Report
Marking Criteria (Weighting 30%)
MARKING CRITERIA HD – (85 - 100%) D - (75 - 84%) C - (65 - 74%) P - (50 - 64%) F - (0 - 49%)
1. Demonstrated
theoretical
understanding of SHRM
frameworks/models
(8%)
Excellent, concise and clear
summary of the SHRM
theoretical concepts.
Addresses all assessment
questions. Clearly
demonstrates how
concepts/theories apply to
practice.
Well-presented and good
summary of the SHRM
theoretical concepts.
Addresses all assessment
questions. Good attempt to
demonstrate how
concepts/theory apply to
practice.
Basic and relevant summary of
the SHRM theoretical concepts.
Addresses most assessment
questions. Basic attempt to
demonstrate how
concepts/theory apply to
practice.
Useful and somewhat
satisfactory summary of the
SHRM theoretical concepts.
Addresses some assessment
questions. Little and
somewhat appropriate
attempt to demonstrate how
concepts/theory apply to
practice.

Unclear or no summary of
the SHRM theoretical
concepts. Addresses some
assessment questions. No
attempt to demonstrate
how concepts/theory apply
to practice.
2. Critical evaluation of
the applicability and
practical relevance of
SHRM
frameworks/models to
core SHRM functions

(12%)
Thoughtful critical evaluation
of the models. A compelling
explanation of their
importance. Excellent relevant
judgement of the application of
the models to one current
issue of SHRM

Good critical evaluation of the
models. A useful explanation
of their importance. Good
clear relevant judgement of
the application of the models
to one current issue of SHRM

Useful critical evaluation of the
models. An explanation of its
importance provided. Clear
relevant judgement of the
application of the models to one
current issue of SHRM

A critical evaluation of the
models. Needs clarity and
reasons for its importance.
Judgement of the application
of the models to one current
issue of SHRM in part but
mostly descriptive.

No critical evaluation of the
models. Lacks clarity and
reasons for its importance
are not given. No real
judgement of the
application to one current
issue of SHRM

3. Ethical implications
and principles

(5%)

Excellent understanding of
ethical implications of SHRM.
Excellent, clear and insightful
outline of the implications.

Well-presented and good
understanding of ethical
implications of SHRM. Well-
presented and good outline of
the implications.
Basic and relevant
understanding of ethical
implications of SHRM. Basic
outline of the implications.

Satisfactory understanding of
ethical implications of SHRM.
Somewhat appropriate and
satisfactory outline of the
implications
Unclear or no
understanding of ethical
implications. Unclear or no
outline of the implications.

4. Communication
(5%)



Excellent and very clear
structure. All sections
completed within page limit.
Excellent communication. No
more than 2 minor
mistakes/errors in grammar,
syntax and spelling.
Reference list and in-text
citations are consistently
accurate throughout
Clear structure. All sections
completed within page limit.
Very good communication.
No more than 3-4
mistakes/errors in grammar,
syntax and spelling.
Reference list and in-text
citations is consistent
throughout
Basic structure. Most sections
completed within page limit.
Basic communication. No more
than 5-6 mistakes/errors in
grammar, syntax and spelling.
Reference list and in-text
citations mostly consistent
throughout. Some minor
inaccuracies or errors.
Adequate structure. An
attempt to fulfil all sections
within page limit. More than
7 to 10 mistakes, errors in
grammar, syntax and
spelling. Reference list and
in-text citations not consistent
throughout. Inaccuracies or
errors evident.
Unclear structure with little
to no attempt to fulfil all
sections within page limit.
Weak communication with
mistakes, errors in
grammar, syntax and
spelling throughout.
References missing and
significant in-text citation
errors throughout.