ECOS2005: Assignment 2 Assessment Criteria
HD D C P F
Weight/
100
Clear and
coherent
explanation of
the fundamental
importance of
persons &
relationship in
Indigenous
economics as
opposed to
individual in
standard
economics
Work is of an outstanding
quality. A concise
explanation of the
fundamental difference of
persons and individuals in
indigenous and standard
economic analysis. The
explanation doesn’t
include quotations.
Work is of a superior
quality. A concise
explanation of the
fundamental difference of
persons and individuals in
indigenous and standard
economic analysis. The
explanation doesn’t
include quotations.
A sound attempt to
explain the fundamental
difference of persons and
individuals in indigenous
and standard economic
analysis with one or two
quotations at most.
A satisfactory attempt to
explain the fundamental
difference of persons
and individuals in
indigenous and standard
economic analysis with
one or two quotations at
most.
An unsatisfactory
attempt to explain the
fundamental difference of
persons and individuals
in indigenous and
standard economic
analysis - several
quotations are included.
25
Clear and
coherent
explanation of
the implications
for open access
resource
management of
making
relationships
fundamental
Work is of outstanding
quality. A clear
explanation of the
implications for open
access resource
management of making
relationships fundamental.
The explanation doesn’t
include quotations.
Work is of outstanding
quality. A clear
explanation of the
implications for open
access resource
management of making
relationships fundamental.
The explanation doesn’t
include quotations.
A sound attempt at
explaining the
implications for open
access resource
management of making
relationships fundamental,
with one or two quotations
at most.
A satisfactory attempt at
explaining the
implications for open
access resource
management of making
relationships
fundamental, with one or
two quotations at most.
An unsatisfactory
attempt at explaining the
implications for open
access resource
management of making
relationships
fundamental, with several
quotations.
25
Clear, and
coherent answer
to question 3- a
yes, no or
maybe response
that is supported
by logical
reasoning
Work is of outstanding
quality. Clear
yes/no/maybe answer that
is supported by sound
logic. The answer doesn’t
include quotations.

Work is of superior
quality. Clear
yes/no/maybe answer that
is supported by logic. The
answer doesn’t include
quotations.

A sound attempt.
Clear yes/no/maybe
answer that is supported
by some logic, with one or
two quotations at most.
A satisfactory attempt to
provide a yes/no/maybe
answer that is supported
by some logic, with one
or two quotations at
most.
An unsatisfactory
attempt – work fails to
clearly provide
a yes/no/maybe answer -
no logic is used - several
quotations are
incorporated into the
answer.
25
Writing
Writing is of an
outstanding quality. Style
is appropriate. Writing is
concise and precise. Free
of spelling and
grammatical errors.
Writing is of a superior
quality. Style is
appropriate. Writing is
concise and precise. Free
of spelling and
grammatical errors.
Writing is of a fair quality.
Style is appropriate. Only
a few spelling and
grammatical errors.
Writing is of an ordinary
quality. Style is
appropriate. Only a few
spelling and
grammatical errors.
Writing quality is
unsatisfactory. Style is
inappropriate (as if
written for a newspaper
article or blog). Many
spelling and grammatical
errors.
20
Referencing &
formatting Consistent and correct
referencing &
bibliography with no
errors. Excellent standard
of formatting with no
errors
Consistent and correct
referencing &
bibliography with no
errors. Superior standard
of formatting with no
errors
Consistent and correct
referencing &
bibliography with no
errors. Adequate standard
of formatting with minor
errors
Attempt is made to
reference correctly &
construct bibliography
but minor errors.
Adequate standard of
formatting with minor
errors
Unsatisfactory
referencing &
unsatisfactory standard
of formatting with major
errors.
5