CHAPTER 5-无代写
时间:2024-09-28
CHAPTER 5
THE PHYSICIAN LABOR MARKET
Econ3004/ Econ6039 Health Economics, 2023 Semester 2
Dr Yijuan Chen, Australian National University
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Outline
 The training of physicians
Medical school & residency
 Returns to medical training
Work hours
 Barriers to entry
 Physician agency
 Physician-induced demand
 Defensive medicine
The training of physicians
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Medical school
 Entry into med school is competitive and
selective worldwide
 In the US, average 50% of applicants are accepted into
at least one school. UC San Diego, for example,
received 6767 applications in 2011 for 149 slots.
 In 2004, there were over twice as many applicants as
spaces at the UK medical schools.
 Medical school can be super-expensive
US: $140k -- $225k for four years
European medical training often is heavily
subsidized
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Medical school
 Length of medical school varies across country
 US & Canada applicants must first get a bachelor’s degree
 Applicants need to have completed a pre-medical curriculum
of biology, physics, chemistry, mathematics, and English.
 The Doctor of Medicine (MD) program usually last 4 years.
 European applicants go directly from high school
 The medical program lasts 5 years in the UK, and 6-7 years in
France
 Australian medical schools offer both Bachelor and Doctoral
degrees
 Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS), usual
duration 6 years
 Doctor of Medicine (MD), usual duration 4 years
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Medical school
 There are about 20 medical schools in Australia
Medical School Affiliation Established
in
Website
Melbourne
Medical School
University of
Melbourne
1862 http://medicine.unimelb
.edu.au
Sydney Medical
School
University of
Sydney
1883 http://sydney.edu.au/m
edicine
University of
Adelaide Medical
School
University of
Adelaide
1885 http://health.adelaide.e
du.au/medicine/
UQ School of
Medicine
University of
Queensland
1936 https://medicine.uq.edu
.au/
ANU Medical
School
ANU 2004 http://medicalschool.an
u.edu.au
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Residency
 In many countries, in addition to classroom work,
physicians-in-training must also gain hospital
experience
 Residency is a period of on-the-job training following
medical school, of which the duration is usually 3+ years.
 The first year of residency is often called internship, after
which doctors-to-be can apply for their license to
practice medicine.
 After the residency, some doctors will further continue
their training in sub-specialties, which may take another
2-3 years, or even 5 years (e.g. cardiac surgery).
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Residency
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Residency
 New residents lack experience, and when new
residents arrive at a hospital, empirical evidence
shows that medical errors go up
 “July effect” in the US
 “August killing season” in the UK
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Physician work-hours
 Work hours
 Over 60 hours a week
 On call residents could work up to 30 consecutive hours
 In 2003, implementation to limit number of hours/week for
US residents
 No more than 80 hours a week
 No more than 24 consecutive hours
 Empirical evidence suggests no change in patient mortality.
 But there may be changes on non-fatal outcomes which
have not been studied.
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Work-hour tradeoffs
 Longer work-hours
 Pros:
 more learning and accumulation of experience;
 an in-patient may remain with the same doctor during her entire stay, and
thus receive more complete care
 Cons: Fatigue may impair physicians’ cognitive abilities and in turn
may affect patient health
 Shorter work-hours
 Requires more hand-offs by physicians and thus greater chance for
error
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Shorter hours leads to fewer errors
 Landrigan (2004) conducted randomized experiment
at Brigham and Woman’s ICU at Harvard
 2 groups of interns: traditional hours (80 hours/week) &
short work week (60 hours/week)
 Traditional hour group
 Committed 36% more serious medical errors
 21% more medication errors
 5.6 times more diagnostic errors
 Patient outcomes do not differ significantly
 Senior physicians intercepted most serious errors
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Shorter hours leads to fewer errors
 However, one may argue that the less chance to make
mistakes also means the less chance to learn.
 A zero-work-hour intern will make zero error!
 Thus one can conjecture that reducing residents’ work-
hours may reduce errors by residents at the expense of
increasing errors by recent graduates of residency
programs.
Returns to medical training
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Returns to medical training
 Unlike most occupations,
returns to medical
training are very back-
loaded
 Medical school & residency
expensive in direct costs
and opportunity costs
 So those who choose
being physician are
patient enough to value
future returns
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Net present value
 Net present value is a way of calculating value of all
future streams of income (from today’s perspective)
 Discount factor δ is a measure of how much less an
individual values future income over present income
 δ lies between 0 and 1; small if impatient and large if
patient
 Those with high δ have high NPV from being a physician
 Those with low δ have low NPV (and maybe even
negative NPV)
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Discount factor
 Another way of expressing discount factor is:
Where r is the discount rate, analogous to the
market interest rate that would make a person with
discount factor δ indifferent between saving for
tomorrow and spending today
 Ex: δ = 0.90 corresponds with r = 0.11
 High patience means a high discount factors δ
and a low discount rate r
δ = 1/(1+r)
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Internal rate of return (IRR)
 Consider two possible career choices P and S with incomes
paths Ip and Is
 Internal rate of return r* is the discount rate which
equalizes the NPV of both careers (or the difference
between NPV(p) – NPV(s) = 0 )
 Someone with IRR of r* values career P and career S
exactly equally
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Internal rate of return (IRR)
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Internal rate of return
 IRR in medicine is typically between 11% and 14%!
 Significantly higher than market interest rate
 This is true for dentists and lawyers too
 IRR may be even higher for medical specialists like
neurosurgeons and immunologists
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Internal rate of return
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Internal rate of return
 The fact that the IRR has stayed high is curious
 It suggests that being a physician is highly lucrative
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Internal rate of return
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Internal rate of return
 The fact that the IRR has stayed high is curious
 Why hasn’t the high income attracted more physicians,
which would have pushed the IRR back down to market
levels?
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Barriers to entry
Barriers to entry may explain the high IRR
 In 19th century, becoming a doctor was simple
 Anyone could do it, no regulation about training
 American Medical Association (1847)
 Pre-req’s for medical school
 4 years medical school
 Require doctors to have a license to practice
 1910 Flexner Report helped shut down low-quality med schools
 Caps on medical school class size
 Caps on residency program enrollment
 Result: fewer medical schools and fewer medical students
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Tradeoffs from barriers to entry
 Because of barriers to entry, consumers have to pay
above the competitive price
 Physicians therefore earn monopoly rents
 Def. wages above the competitive price due to artificial
constraint of the market
 On the other hand, barriers to entry ensures that
physicians are qualified
 The monopoly rents the patients pay for good health
care may outweigh the patients’ cost to search for good
health care in a more competitive market
Physician agents
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Physicians as agents
 Patients trust physicians to act as perfect agents
for their health
 Doctors’ foremost concern should be patients’ well-
being
Not their own financial status or reputation
 Are doctors always perfect agents for their
patients?
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Physician-induced demand (PID)
 Information asymmetry between doctor and
patient
 Patients cannot assess whether an extra test or
procedure ordered by doctor is necessary
 Doctors may have the financial incentive to
prescribe more services than needed
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Physician-induced demand (PID)
 Hickson et al. (1987) randomly assigned a group
of pediatric residents to be either paid by a fixed
salary or paid according to the amount of service
provided (fee-for-service)
 The “fee-for-service” group scheduled more visits
per patient:
 than the fixed-salary group.
 than recommended by the American Academy of
Pediatrics
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Physician-induced demand (PID)
 Empirical studies also find that
 Thoracic surgeons compensated for a round of cuts to
Medicare fees in 1990 by performing more surgeries. ( Yip
1998)
 Physicians who recently became owners of back and spine
clinics recommended more surgeries than before they opened
their own clinics. (Mitchell , 2008)
 Physicians who owned their own MRI machines ordered more
MRI tests than those who had to refer patients to outside MRI
scans. (Baker 2010)
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Physician-induced demand (PID)
 The existence of PID poses a challenge to insurers:
 Setting high reimbursement could lead to doctors to over
prescribe certain procedures.
 Setting low reimbursement could cause the doctors to
substitute the appropriate procedure by other, more
lucrative, procedures.
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Defensive medicine
 Doctors fearful of lawsuit may overprescribe (and
overcharge) for only marginally-useful procedures
 Between 1991 and 2005, 7.4% of all US physicians
covered by a large liability insurer faced at least one
medical malpractice lawsuit. The average payout on
successful claims was $274,887. (Jena, et al. 2011)
 Mello et al. (2010) estimate that medical liability
system in the US costs $55.6 billion annually
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Defensive medicine
 Studdert et al. (2005) show that, Among the high-risk
practitioners in Pennsylvania, USA
 93% of surveyed doctors reported practicing defensive
medicine.
 59% conducted more diagnostic tests than they thought
were medically necessary.
 39% avoided caring for high-risk patients in order to
reduce their exposure to liability.
Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics
Conclusion
 Physician supply highly regulated
 Leads to a shortage of doctors
 Hard for other health care providers to fill the void
 Investment returns to being a doctor and
specializing is very high
 Physicians are not always perfect agents of care
 Overutilization of care
 Physician-induced demand and defensive medicine
essay、essay代写