DPBS 1190 - Marking Rubrics for Assessment 2: Individual Project Report

Weight
%
Criteria Fail (0% - 49%) Pass
(50% -
64%)
Credit
(65%-
74%)
Distinction
(75%-84%)
High Distinction
(85% - 100%)

10 Problem Identification  Does not identify a
business problem or a
task objective.
 Identify a
business problem
but misses many
details.
 Identify a business
problem but misses a
few details.
 Identify a business
problem and task
objectives covering
important aspects of
business context.
 Identify a business
problem and task
objectives with clarity
and depth, supported
by real-life business
context.
45 Data Analysis  Assessment
requirements were
not followed and no
relevant
visualization
technique and
descriptive statistics
was used.
 Use visualization
techniques and
descriptive
statistics,
mentioned in the
Assessment
Guide for solving
the problem.
 Identify variables
for each technique
to be deployed.
 Attempt to present
a logic between
business issues,
analytical
techniques, and
variable selection,
but the logic is not
coherent or clear.
 The data
subsetting is
done
appropriately in
line with the
business goal.
 Use visualization
techniques and
descriptive statistics
with a good
explanation and
clarity in line with
Assessment Guide
for solving the
problem in line with
Assessment Guide.
 Identify and explain
variables for each
technique to be
deployed.
 Attempt to present a
logic between
business issues,
analytical
techniques, and
variable selection.
 Analyze data but
explanations of
analysis results are
insufficient.
 The data
subsetting is
done
appropriately in
line with the
business goal.
 Use visualization
techniques and
descriptive statistics
providing higher
level of clarity and
explanation in line
with Assessment
Guide for solving
the problem.
 Identify, explain,
and justify variables
for each technique
to be deployed.
 Explicitly present a
logic between
business issues,
analytical
techniques, and
variable selection.
 Analyze data
adequately with
sufficient
explanations of the
issues identified, but
the solutions to
solving the issues
 Use all visualization
techniques mentioned
in the Assessment
Guide and descriptive
statistics for solving
the problem with
excellent clarity and
explanation.
 Identify, explain, and
justify variables for
each technique to be
deployed. The
justifications are
sound and convincing.
 Explicitly present a
coherent and clear
logic between
business issues,
analytical techniques,
and variable
selection. The logic is
coherent and clear.
 Analyze data
adequately with
sufficient
 No appropriate
data subsetting
done.
 No specific
variable was
identified.
 No logic between
business issues,
analytical techniques,
and variable selection.

 The results are mostly
incorrectly interpreted.

 No discussion on outlier
implications.

 No R codes are included.



Weight
%
Criteria Fail (0% -
49%)
Pass
(50% -
64%)
Credit
(65%-
74%)
Distinction
(75%-84%)
High Distinction
(85% - 100%)
 Attempt to
analyze data but
conduct
inadequate data
analysis in some
aspects.
 The results are
somewhat
correctly
examined and
interpreted.
 Discussion on
outlier analysis
and their
implications is
somewhat
explained.
 R codes are
included but
extensive errors
are identified.
 The results are
mostly correctly
examined and
interpreted.

 Discussion on
outlier analysis
and their
implications is
clearly explained
but appropriate
variables are not
taken into account.

 R codes are
included but some
errors are identified.
identified are
reasonably
sufficient.
 The data
subsetting is done
appropriately in
line with the
business goal
 The results of each
model are mostly
correctly
interpreted and
examined
supported by
academic
references. Results
interpretation is
relevant and
meaningful in the
case context.
 Discussion on
outlier analysis
and their
implications is
clearly explained
with appropriate
variables
considered.

 R codes attached
are mostly correct.
explanations of the
issues identified,
and with adequate
solutions to the
issues identified
using statistics and
visualization.
 The data subsetting
is done appropriately
in line with the
business goal.
 The results of each
visualization and
findings are correctly
interpreted and
critically examined
supported by
academic
references. Results
interpretation is
relevant and
meaningful in the
case context.
 Discussion on outlier
analysis and their
implications
explained in a very
comprehensive
manner.
 R codes attached
are thoroughly
correct.
30 Insights  Inadequate or no
insights of the
analysis/evidence are
provided.
 Insights are
somewhat
inconsistently tied
to some of the
issues discussed
and inconsistently
linked back to
variables analyzed.
 Insights are
consistently tied to
each issue
discussed and
linked back to
variables analyzed.
 Insights are logically
and consistently tied
to each issue
discussed and linked
back to variables
analyzed.
 Insights are
logically and
consistently tied to
each issue
discussed, linked
back to variables
analyzed, and
developed with
critical thinking.
Weight
%
Criteria Fail
(0% - 49%)
Pass
(50% - 64%)
Credit
(65%-74%)
Distinction
(75%-84%)
High Distinction
(85% - 100%)

10 Communication  Your writing is not
professional in tone
and there are major
spelling and
grammatical errors
throughout.
 Your written
expression does not
indicate a logic/flow
between each
section of the essay.
 Some attempt has
been made to use a
professional tone and
presentation in your
writing, but there are
some spelling and
grammatical errors.
 You have endeavored
to provide logic/flow
between each section
of the essay.
 Your writing is mostly
professional in tone
and presentation, but
there are occasional
spelling and/or
grammatical errors.
 Your written
expression provides
an adequate
indication of the
logic/flow between
each section of the
essay.
 Your writing is
professional in tone
and presentation
with a few very minor
spellings and/or
grammatical errors.
 Your written
expression provides
a strong indication of
the logic/flow
between each
section of the essay.
 Your writing is
professional in tone
and presented in an
outstanding manner
with no spelling or
grammatical errors.
 Your written
expression provides a
strong and coherent
indication of the
logic/flow between
each section of the
essay that has
enabled key
arguments to
fully develop.
05 Organization and
structure of the
report
 Poor or unclear
structure.
 Your sources have
not been referenced
and/or there are
excessive errors in
referencing in the
report.
 The word limit has
not been adhered to
in line with the
Assessment Guide.
 Attempt to a good
structure but lack
coherent flow
between sections.
 Some sources are
referenced throughout
the report, but there
are errors in your
referencing of
sources.
 The word limit has
been adhered.
 Good structure with
organized headings.
 Most sources are
referenced
throughout the
report, with only
minor errors in
referencing.
 The word limit has
been adhered.
 Good structure with
organized headings
and coherent follow
between sections.
 All sources are
referenced
throughout the
report with only
minor errors in
referencing.
 The word limit
has been
adhered.
 Good structure with
organized headings
and coherent follow
between sections.
 All sources are
referenced
throughout the report
and the sources are
used very well, with
no significant errors
in referencing.
 The word limit has
been adhered.


学霸联盟