Aesthetics and Art Lecture 2 PHIL 2618/3681 Professor David Macarthur “Aesthetics” in C18 Germany • Baumgarten (1739): “Aesthetics… is the science of sensitive cognition”. • We might say it concerns interesting perceptible properties. • “Sensitive cognition” sounds like an oxymoron! • How could something sensory be a form of cognition (knowledge, understanding, truth)? Beauty and the Sublime • C18: great interest in the beautiful and the sublime in nature; and in art & architecture. • Q: What about other aesthetic terms e.g. dainty, graceful, ugly, unbalanced… • Central idea: the freedom of the imagination as represented by the artistic genius. Lecture 1 - Summary • Plato: “art” (craft) = an imitation of nature (often human nature) or its “appearances”. • Art concerns a non-cognitive (not-knowing) emotional experience. • Plato recognizes that there are many ideas of ‘imitation’: imitating a look, or a sound; impersonating human character or action, etc. • Plato also speaks of ‘imitating’ the Forms by way of imperfect instantiation. Note Forms, being abstract, have no appearances. Aristotle’s “Yes, but…” Qualifications of Plato • Art is imitative not of actual nature but of possible nature (what it might become as opposed to what it is). Art concerns the plausible. • Art is not theoretical knowledge but involves practical knowledge about character, how to act and live well. • Art is emotive but not dangerously so. Tragedy, which arouses pity and fear, can also dissipate these emotions through catharsis. Platonic Insights • Art as a from of inspired craftsmanship is an artefact: something made by human intentional activity for some purpose. • Q: What is the purpose of art? • It may have some representational content which falls short of knowledge. • Q: if art is not knowledge how can it seem to be knowledge? • Art has great (perhaps dangerous) emotive power which leads Plato into questions of censorship. Plato’s Banishment of Poetry from the Just City • Background: In ancient Greek life, epic and dramatic poetry (which involved a chorus, actors and dancers) was used for educational purposes. • Poetic presentations of heroic deeds of men and Gods provided morally authoritative exemplars of noble characters and action. • Plato only banishes poetry from the “just city” – not painting or music or sculpture. • This cannot be a matter of its imitative nature or its emotional impact since all of these arts are imitative and emotional. • Why is poetry, in particular, singled out? Plato on Emotion in Art • Art has a powerful destablizing effects on us: (1) It appeals to the non-rational part of us and so is dangerous and must be controlled; (2) Its content is not constrained by the state or the political will. It is, according to the Platonic myth, divinely inspired; that is, it is free or autonomous in what it is about and the means used. Emotion & Politics • Art, through its emotive power, can suggest alternative ways to be, alternative things to value – again something dangerous from the point of view of dictators and authoritarian politics. • Recall how “degenerate” art was banished and artists imprisioned by Hitler, Mao and the Khmer Rouge. Emotion: Two Visions • For Plato emotion is an affective non-cognitive state that has ungovernable action tendencies. E.g. fear, anger, elation, love. • For Aristotle emotion is affective and (partially) cognitive. It can be sensitive, to some extent, to reason. • Is emotion a non-rational disruptive force in our lives as Plato, Hume, Freud (etc.) think or is it a quasi-rational state that can be reasoned with and that is a form of cognition as Aristotle, neo-Kantians (etc.) think? • How is one to argue for a vision of human nature? One’s basic way of seeing things is an unargued starting point in discussion. R.G. Collingwood § 1889–1943 § Maverick Oxford philosopher § A trained archeologist and historian. § Both of his parents were artists. Art vs Craft • Since C18 we distinguish “art proper” (fine art) from craft (the useful arts, mere craft). • Craft involves distinctions between – Means and end – Planning and execution – Raw materials and finished product – Form and matter • Art need not involve any of these, and certainly not all of them. Pseudo-Art • “Representation… is always means to an end… the re-evocation of certain emotions.” • So representation is a craft with a predetermined end in view. • Collingwood distinguishes two forms of representational “pseudo-art”: 1. “Magic art” arouses specific emotions by way of representation for spiritual or practical ends. e.g. cave painting. 2. “Entertainment art” arouses specific emotions by way of representation for amusement. • Because magic art and entertainment art are directed at a certain goal both are forms of craft (not art) according to Collingwood. They are means to some pre- determined spiritual or practical end by way of representation – a device of craftwork. Art Proper • True art expresses the artist’s emotion through a process of self-discovery. • Pseudo-art arouses the audience’s emotion as a predetermined end. • The emotion expressed by an artwork is that of the artist. • Note the important link Collingwood sees between art and self-knowledge. What is Emotion? 1. Emotions are often thought to have “objects” e.g. the loved person, the feared dog. Are these intentional objects? Or perhaps only causal triggers? 2. Emotions may involve, or are related to, certain views about the world e.g. pride typically involves a belief that one has done something worthy, creditable. 3. Emotions are action tendencies: if one is afraid of the dog then one will avoid it. 4. Emotions involve seeing-as: in anger I see another as offensive. 6. Distinguish complex emotions (e.g. pride, shame, pity) from simple emotions (e.g. anger, joy). Emotions are or include complex psychological states that it makes sense to think we could be unclear or confused about (in contrast to mere feelings like pain). Art = Expression of Emotion • Art is the expression of emotion. • But what does Collingwood mean by “expression” here? • Not mere expression. Not just betraying or exhibiting emotion. E.g. showing signs of anger is not an artwork. • Nor does it mean arousing emotion in an audience. Representation and Expression • One can employ Collingwood’s theory to representational art so long as one relaxes Collingwood’s own view of representation as having a predetermined goal. • Representational art can be understood in terms of the expression of emotion. • This inclusiveness is a strength of the expressive theory of art. • So it is possible to read Plato as an expressivist about poetry at least. That is, poetic ‘imitations’ of nature can be thought of as expressing certain emotions since on Plato’s own grounds poetry is not a genuine craft. Stages in the Artistic Process • At first the artist is merely conscious of having some inchoate emotion, which is oppressive. • Then they express the emotion in some physical art medium, e.g., words, marble, sounds, paint. • Through artistic expression the emotion becomes conscious and determinate by being articulated, symbolized etc. In this form one is no longer oppressed by it. • Cp. Freudian psychoanalysis. Collingwood vs Tolstoy • The physically realized expression leads oneself and the audience to understand how one feels. But it is not required that one feels exactly the same emotion oneself. • Contrast this with Tolstoy’s “infection theory” of art. • In Tolstoy’s view (in What is Art?) an artist “infects” other people, through their art, with the precise feeling that the artist experienced themselves in reality or imagination. Description & Two Kinds of Expression • Distinguish mere (non-deliberative) expressions of anger (“Ouch!”) describing anger “I’m really angry!” and conscious or deliberative expression. • Note these are not exclusive categories: one can express anger by describing it! • Collingwood is interested in the difference between the general description of emotion and a particular form of deliberative expression of it. Embodiment • Expression is essentially embodied or mediated. • The emotion does not exist apart from its embodiment. It is not something that exists, say, in the head. • Works of art exist in the publically accessible media of their various embodiments. • To explore one’s emotions is to explore the artistic medium through which they are expressed. Art is Deliberative • On Collingwood’s view the activity of art is a conscious, intentional, directed activity of expression by way of some art-specific medium to some audience. • If the requisite deliberative activity does not transpire, then there is no art. A Common Humanity • Collingwood’s master idea: whenever a person has articulated their feeling (based on some apprehension of the world) sufficiently to make it accessible to others, then they have produced a work of art. • This idea relies on the idea of a common humanity i.e. a sharable understanding of human responsiveness to the world, including the modes of expressivity employed by artworks. Art & Self-Knowledge • The artist’s self-discovery represents a possible self-discovery on the part of the audience with respect to their own (actual or potential) feelings. • The artist’s process of self-knowledge is tested by its communicability to others; emotional clarity is a matter of one’s objectified expression being understandable to others. Art & Modern Skepticism • Idea: An artwork is analogous to another mind. • Suggestion: Art is a realm in which the issue of our comprehensibility to one another is explored. • Our responsiveness to art emblematizes our comprehensibility to one another; our lack of responsiveness to art emblematizes our lack of comprehensibility. • Modern art often strikes its audience as incomprehensible. The Importance of Art • The importance of this depends upon a threat to the very idea of our being comprehensible to one another in modern philosophy. • This is what philosophy calls skepticism about other minds. • Art both engages with the skeptical stance of incomprehensibility and the non-skeptical stance of comprehensibility. • The importance of art, then, concerns the importance of overcoming skepticism of other minds, our common need for love and fellowship. Art & Intimacy • Agreement in our responses to art is a source of intimacy which contrasts with factual agreements about objective matters e.g. about the weather or the price of petrol. • It is not based on compelling evidence, nor is it guaranteed. • Art can be a source of intimacy between strangers: the instant rapport you feel with someone who shares your love of film, novel, dance, opera, etc. or particular examples of these or the artists who made them.
学霸联盟