FINC3600 - 5RS REFLECTION MARKING RUBRIC
Reflective practice is worth 15%.

Criteria / Level HD DI CR PS FA
Reporting (2%) Key events and relevant information are
explained clearly and concisely,
providing a comprehensive
understanding of the situation.
Key events and relevant
information about the
situation are explained with
some clarity and
completeness.
Generally accurate
explanation of key events
and relevant information, but
may lack some clarity.
Provides a basic description
of events with some relevant
information, though details
are often superficial or
unclear.

The situation or experience is
described with minimal or
irrelevant/superficial
information.
Responding (2%) The student clearly acknowledges the
emotional impact of the situation and
thoughtfully explores the reasons behind
their feelings or reactions.
The student expresses their
feelings or reactions and
begins to explore why they
felt or reacted this way, but
with limited depth.
Adequate expression of
feelings and reactions with
some understanding of their
causes, though exploration is
not fully developed.

Limited expression of
personal feelings or reactions
with minimal
acknowledgment of their
impact.
Fails to provide a meaningful
emotional or professional
response, showing a lack of
insight into personal impacts.
Relating (4%) The student makes insightful connections
between the experience and prior
knowledge, research or experiences,
demonstrating a deep understanding of
the broader implications.
Connections between the
experience and prior
knowledge, research or
experiences are made,
showing a good level of
understanding but with room
for deeper insights.

Some connections are made
between the experience,
research and prior
knowledge, though these
connections may be
underdeveloped or
superficial.
Basic connections are
attempted between the
experience and prior
knowledge but are often
unclear or not well
articulated.
The connection between the
experience and prior
knowledge or experiences is
unclear or not addressed.
Reasoning (4%) The student offers a thorough and
nuanced analysis of the situation,
incorporating multiple perspectives and
demonstrating strong critical thinking,
exceptional understanding and
application.
The student provides a
detailed analysis of the
situation, but it may not fully
integrate multiple
perspectives or show deep
critical thinking, but with
minor room for deeper
analysis.

Some analysis of the
situation is evident, but it
lacks depth and may miss
multiple perspectives and
lacks depth and breadth in
analysis.
Basic reasoning about
experiences and themes is
evident but lacks depth and
critical perspective.
Poor reasoning or inadequate
connection between
experiences and themes,
showing significant
misunderstandings.
Reconstructing
(3%)
The student demonstrates high-level
thinking with a critically applied and
logically drawn conclusion from the
experiences. Shows exceptional
understanding and insightful application
to future situations.
The student provides a well-
constructed conclusion with
logical connections, but may
lack some critical depth or
full application to future
scenarios.

The student includes a
conclusion that is logically
connected to the
experiences, but it is general
and lacks detailed
application.
The student provides a basic
conclusion with minimal
reflection on future actions or
implications.
The student fails to provide a
coherent conclusion or any
meaningful reflection on future
applications.


学霸联盟