MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 1 of 6


ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MGT201A – Project Management
Assessment Task Consultative Report
Individual/Group Individual or Group
Length 2,000 words (or equivalent)
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
completion of the task below include:
a) Analyse PM principles and performance domains.
b) Interpret the collaborative role and functions of the project
manager, team and stakeholders.
c) Justify relevant PM methodologies for selected projects.
Submission 12-week duration:
Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 8 (Week 8)
6-week duration:
Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 8 (Week 4)
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 100 marks

Assessment Task
This assessment builds upon the foundational knowledge and skills developed in Assessment 1,
where you selected a project. You will now expand your initial analysis by preparing a
comprehensive consultative report that critically evaluates project selection, planning, and work
strategies within the context of project management.
Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

Context
Effective project management is a critical skill in today's dynamic business environment.
Organisations must select and manage projects strategically to maximize efficiency, minimize risks,
and deliver value. This consultative report assessment challenges you to apply project management
theories, particularly the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) framework v7, to
analyse project selection, planning, and execution.


MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 2 of 6


You will critically evaluate how project methodologies such as Agile and Waterfall influence project
outcomes, applying structured project planning techniques to develop a robust project management
plan. The assessment also emphasises stakeholder engagement, risk management, and resource
allocation, helping you gain practical, real-world project management skills that align with industry
standards.

By completing this assessment, you will deepen your ability to think strategically, manage project
constraints, and apply project management frameworks in diverse contexts. Whether undertaken
individually or as a group, the report serves as a practical demonstration of project selection and
planning expertise, reinforcing critical skills required for professional project management roles.

Instructions
In this report, you are required to apply key frameworks from the PMBOK v7 to the selected project.
The report should demonstrate a clear understanding of project selection criteria, stakeholder
engagement, planning constraints, risk management, and delivery methodologies, while integrating
PMBOK terminology and processes throughout.
Your group must select from one of the project scenarios provided to you in Assessment 1. You may
work on the same project you selected in Assessment 1, using this as a chance to deepen your
analysis.
Note: This assessment can be completed either individually or in groups of up to four members. If
completed in a group, all members must contribute equally, and a peer evaluation must be
conducted.
The Consultative Report should be structured as follows:

1. Introduction (Approx. 150 words)
• Brief overview of the selected project.
• Purpose of the report.

2. Project Selection and Strategic Alignment (Approx. 400 words)
• Explanation of how the project aligns with business goals and stakeholder needs.
• Consideration of key project financial and non-financial selection criteria including:
feasibility, cost-benefit analysis, business strategic drivers, and/or SWOT analysis.

3. Project Scope and Planning (Approx. 300 words)
• Clearly define project scope (In-Scope and Out-of-Scope elements).
• Identify key project constraints (time, cost, resources, risk, quality) as per PMBOK's
Principles and Performance Domains.
• Incorporate a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and milestone definition. Include
assumptions and dependencies.

4. Methodology and Delivery Approach (Approx. 400 words)
• Comparison of Agile and Waterfall methodologies in relation to the project.


MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 3 of 6

• Overview of key project phases and execution strategies, using PMBOK's development,
planning, work, delivery and measurement performance domains.

5. Stakeholder Engagement and Communication (Approx. 300 words)
• Identification of key stakeholders and their roles, using PMBOK stakeholder engagement
techniques.
• Development of a Stakeholder Communication Plan aligned with PMBOK
communication principles.
• Strategies for managing stakeholder expectations and feedback loops.

6. Risk and Resource Management (Approx. 300 words)
• Identification of potential project risks and mitigation strategies, applying PMBOK risk
management processes.
• Resource planning and allocation for people management
• Budget considerations and cost estimation techniques using PMBOK cost management
guidelines.

7. Conclusion and Recommendations (Approx. 150 words)
• Summary of key findings.
• Reflection on professional learnings from the assessment process.


Referencing
It is essential that you use current APA style for citing and referencing the sources that you use.
Please see more information on citing and referencing guidelines on the Academic Success webpage.

Assessment Support
For a range of additional resources and support to help you complete your assessment, please
consult the Study Support page on the Student Hub.


Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that their submitted work is original, adheres to academic
writing standards outlined in the Torrens University Academic Writing Guide, and is appropriately
referenced according to the guidelines provided in the Torrens University APA Referencing Guide.
Students need to have read and be aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity
Policy, Academic Integrity Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. For more
information, please refer to the Academic Integrity guidelines and the Torrens University Library.
Students must also keep all required evidence in making an assessment; a copy of all submitted
material and any assessment drafts.


MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 4 of 6

Generative AI
Please refer to the Torrens University Library for guidance on the use of Generative AI. Please speak
to your learning facilitator regarding the use of GenAI tools in your assessments.

Submission Instructions
Submit this task via Assessments > Briefs & Submissions in the main navigation menu in MGT201A –
Project Management. Please name your file using the following format:
o SubjectCode_Surname_FirstNameInitial_AssessmentNumber
e.g. MGT201A _Jones_S_Assessment 2.docx
Your marked assessment can be viewed in MyLearn.

Assessment Due Dates and Late Penalties
Assessments may be submitted on or before the due date. Late penalties apply for assessments that
are submitted after the due date.
Refer to:
• Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework (HE) and ELICOS
Torrens University | Think Education
• Assessment Special Consideration Guidelines for Students (HE Coursework)
Torrens University | Think Education
• Student Hub for Assessment Extension Information.


Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment task or exam due to
unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher
Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed
Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your learning facilitator.


MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 5 of 6


Assessment Rubric
Assessment Criteria
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0-49%
Effective
Communication
(Written)

Percentage for this
criterion = 20%

Communicates eloquently,
coherently, concisely and
creatively in a manner that
adheres to the given format.
Discerningly selects and
precisely employs a wide
range of specialised language
and terminology.
Spelling, grammar and
punctuation are free from
errors.
Communicates
coherently and
concisely in a manner
that adheres to the
given format.

Accurately employs a wide
range of specialised
language and terminology.

Occasional minor errors
are present in the spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation.
Communicates in a
coherent and readable
manner that adheres to
the given format.

Accurately employs
specialised language and
terminology.

Occasional errors are
present in the spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation.
Communicates in a
mostly readable manner
that largely adheres to
the given format.

Employs specialised
language and terminology
with some inaccuracies.

Some errors are present
in the spelling, grammar
and/or punctuation.
Presents information which
is not clearly organised or
easy to follow.
Specialised language and
terminology are
inaccurately or rarely
employed.

Numerous errors are
present in the spelling,
grammar, and/or
punctuation.

Project Selection and
Strategic Alignment

Percentage for this
criterion = 20%
Provides a compelling and
well-structured analysis of
project selection and
strategic alignment, using
PMBOK project selection
models effectively.
Provides a clear and
structured analysis of
project selection and
strategic alignment, using
PMBOK project selection
models effectively.
Provides a reasonable
analysis of project selection
and strategic alignment,
using some PMBOK project
selection models.
Provides a basic analysis of
project selection and
strategic alignment, with
limited use of PMBOK
project selection models.
Fails to provide a clear
analysis of project selection
and strategic alignment,
with little to no use of
PMBOK project selection
models.


MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 6 of 6

Methodology and
Delivery Approach

Percentage for this
criterion = 20%
Provides a comprehensive
comparison of Agile and
Waterfall methodologies,
justifying the chosen
approach with strong
references to PMBOK v7
development approaches
and lifecycle considerations.
Clearly outlines key project
phases and execution
strategies.
Provides a detailed
comparison of Agile and
Waterfall methodologies,
justifying the chosen
approach with good
references to PMBOK v7
development approaches
and lifecycle
considerations. Outlines
key project phases and
execution strategies.
Provides a reasonable
comparison of Agile and
Waterfall methodologies,
justifying the chosen
approach with some
references to PMBOK v7
development approaches
and lifecycle
considerations. Outlines key
project phases and
execution strategies.
Provides a basic comparison
of Agile and Waterfall
methodologies, with limited
justification for the chosen
approach and minimal
references to PMBOK v7
development approaches
and lifecycle considerations.
Outlines some project
phases and execution
strategies.
Fails to provide a clear
comparison of Agile and
Waterfall methodologies,
with inadequate
justification for the chosen
approach and little to no
reference to PMBOK v7
development approaches
and lifecycle
considerations. Lacks clear
project phases and
execution strategies.
Stakeholder
Communication

Percentage for this
criterion = 20%
Comprehensive stakeholder
identification, engagement
strategies, and clear
communication plan using
PMBOK principles.
Strong stakeholder
analysis with minor gaps in
engagement strategies.
Adequate stakeholder
engagement with some
inconsistencies in
communication plans.
Basic stakeholder
identification with limited
communication strategies.
Poor stakeholder
engagement with
inadequate communication
planning.
Use of sources
Correct citation and
referencing of key
resources and evidence

Percentage for this
criterion = 20%
Demonstrates use of credible
and relevant resources to
explicitly support and
develop arguments and
position statements.
Uses the most recent edition
of APA referencing with no
errors.
Demonstrates use of
credible and relevant
resources to support and
develop arguments and
statements.
Uses the most recent
edition of APA referencing
with minor errors.
Demonstrates use of
credible and relevant
resources to support and
develop most of the ideas.
Uses the most recent
edition of APA referencing
with occasional errors.
Demonstrates use of
credible and relevant
resources to support and
develop ideas, but these are
not always explicit or well-
developed.
Uses the most recent
edition of APA referencing
but there are frequent
errors.
Demonstrates inconsistent
use of credible and relevant
resources to support and
develop ideas.
Referencing does not
resemble the most recent
edition of APA or has been
omitted.


学霸联盟