BUSS2000: Design the Future You Assignment ( /30 ). 1700 words +/-10%

High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail

Part 1: Who am I? (15%, equivalent to 4.5 marks) L02,L03


Critical Self-Analysis drawing on a
minimum of TWO individual
characteristics about understanding
self (Theme 1).
Evaluate evidence from self-
reported data, concepts, literature
and theories to better lead self and
influence on your career
preferences, choices and person-
organisation fit. (4.5 marks)

*see Canvas for considerations to
guide your analysis

Applies at least two individual
characteristics applied with
exceptional critical analysis about
understanding the self (e.g.,
personality, strengths, abilities,
motivations, values, and ethics).
Integrates evidence, insights
cohesively, reflecting deeply on
personal experiences and relevant
theories. Shows a holistic, nuanced
understanding of how self-
awareness informs career
preferences and potential
organisational fit.
Applies at least two individual
characteristics with strong
critical analysis about
understanding the self.
Integrates evidence and
insights effectively, reflecting
thoughtfully on personal
experiences and relevant
theories. Demonstrates a
comprehensive understanding
of how self-awareness informs
career preferences and
potential organisational fit.
Applies at least two
individual characteristics
with good critical analysis
about understanding the
self. Integrates evidence and
insights adequately,
reflecting on personal
experiences and relevant
theories. Shows a clear
understanding of how self-
awareness informs career
preferences and potential
organisational fit.
Applies at least two individual
characteristic with basic critical
analysis about understanding the
self. Integrates some evidence and
insights are surface descriptions
lacking connections to personal
experiences and marginal use of
theories. Demonstrates a basic
understanding of how self-
awareness informs career
preferences and potential
organisational fit.
Fails to apply minimum of two
individual characteristics with
critical analysis about
understanding the self. Lacks
integration of evidence and
insights, with minimal or no
reflection on personal
experiences and relevant
theories. Shows a limited or no
understanding of how self-
awareness informs career
preferences and potential
organisational fit.

Part 2 Where am I headed – your two 3-year plans A & B & Reflection (20% equivalent to 6 marks) L02, L03


Screen Shots: 1) Two Screen shots
of your 3-year Plan A & Plan B
sighted in the body of the main
report (0.5 mark)
+
2) Two screen shots of a)
Life/Work-view & b) broader goals –
in the Appendices ( 0.5 mark)

NA NA NA 1) Provided screen shot of the
completed two 3-year Plan A and
Plan B (in the body of the main
report)
2) Provided screen shots of
Life/Work view and Broader goals (in
the Appendices)
1) Provided only 1 screen shot
or no screen shot of the 3-
year Plan A & B
2) Provided only 1 screen shot
or no screen shot of
Life/work view and Broader
Goals.
Critical Self Reflection (5 marks)
Critically analyse and compare
your realistic and alternative plans
by applying TWO career theories

*see canvas for considerations to
guide reflection.

Compare plans with exceptional
critical insights using two career
theories, reflecting deeply on key
differences and personal, nuanced
insights. Beyond strong alignment,
it connects career plans with
emerging and future work skills,
showing a forward-thinking
approach.
Compare plans using two
career theories with strong
critical insights, clearly
identifying key differences and
personal implications.
Demonstrates good alignment
and good consideration of
future-oriented skills or trends.
Compares plan using two
career theories with good
critical analysis and some
clear reflection on
differences. Shows
reasonable alignment and
good consideration of future
skills or trends
Provides a basic comparison with
limited reflection and applies only
one career theory. Shows some
alignment between career plans
and chosen major(s) and limited
consideration of future skills or
trends.
Does not compare plans or
reflect on differences and
does not apply career
theories. Does not align
career plans with chosen
major(s) and no consideration
of future skills or trends.

(rubric continues on the next page)



Part 3 My development, goal setting and motivation reflection (20% equivalent to 6 marks) L02,L03

Identify ONE key area for growth
that aligns with one of your future
plans and articulate how it is critical
to your future success (1.5 marks)
+
Develop ONE SMART Goal. Turn
your growth area into a SMART Goal
(2 marks)
*See canvas for considerations to
guide this area
Identifies a critical growth area
with exceptionally clear
articulation of its relevance to
future success. Provides an
exceptionally clear SMART Goal,
extremely well articulated, little to
no ambiguity.
Identifies a growth area with a
very clear articulation of its
relevance to future success.
SMART Goal is very clear and
well articulated with minor
ambiguity.
Identifies a growth area with
good identification of its
relevance to future success.
The goal demonstrates
understanding of the SMART
framework but lacks depth in
one or more dimensions.
Identifies a growth area with
relevance to future success. There
is a basic understanding of SMART
goal, written with limited clarity or
feasibility and significant room for
improvement in most areas of the
SMART framework.
Does not identify a growth
area with little or no
relevance to future success.
Provides a vague and/or
inaccurate understanding of
SMART goal and /or fails to
align to the identified growth
area.
Motivation Critical Reflection
Apply ONE motivational theory.
Explain how and why your SMART
goal will sustain your motivation
over time, considering factors such
as self-efficacy, personal
commitment, feedback, and
accountability (2.5 marks)
*see canvas for considerations to
guide reflection.
Provides a deep and exceptionally
insightful critical application of a
chosen motivational theory that
influences goal-setting behavior and
outcomes. Clearly explains and
evaluates with depth and
complexity in thinking as to how the
theory relates to the goal and
sustains motivation over time.
Provides a strong reflection
with clear and supported
explanations of how the
chosen theory influences
motivation and goal setting.
Includes depth and some
complexity in explaining and
evaluating how the theory
relates to the goal and sustains
motivation over time.
Provides a good reflection
and application of a chosen
theory's influence on goal
setting. Explanations include
how the theory relates to
the goal and sustains
motivation over time is
mostly clear.
Provides a basic reflection and
analysis of the theory’s influence
on goal setting behaviour.
Explanations are limited and
lacking in detail.
Lacks understanding, vague
and/or inaccurate application
of the chosen motivational
theory. No explanation of how
the theory relates to the goal
and sustains motivation over
time.













Part 4: Beyond the Degree—Committing to Responsible Leadership and ongoing growth (20%) equivalent to 6 marks) L02, L03. L06
Articulates a clear, thoughtful, and
forward-looking reflection on
becoming a responsible, ethical,
self-aware professional and leader
beyond university. (6 marks)
See canvas for considerations to
guide your reflection
Provides an exceptionally deep
and authentic reflection that
clearly articulates a compelling
vision for the future self.
Demonstrates strong ethical
awareness, integrating values,
behaviours, and habits with clarity.
Shows nuanced understanding of
navigating uncertainty and moral
challenges, explicitly connecting to
one or more ethical approaches.
Demonstrates a strong
commitment to lifelong learning
and responsible leadership.
Provides strong insights with
substantial self-awareness and
clear planning. Offers a well-
developed and insightful
reflection with a clear vision
for the future self.
Demonstrates good ethical
awareness and explains how
values and behaviours will
guide future actions.
Addresses uncertainty and
moral challenges with some
connection to ethical
approaches. Shows
commitment to ongoing
growth and responsible
leadership.
Provides a good reflection
with a sound vision for the
future self. Identifies relevant
values and behaviours but
with limited depth. Mentions
strategies for navigating
uncertainty and moral
challenges, with limited
implicit reference to ethical
approaches. Shows some
awareness of ongoing growth.
Provides a basic reflection with a
general or vague vision for the
future self. Limited discussion of
values, behaviours, or strategies
for ethical self-leadership. Little or
no explicit connection to ethical
approaches. Shows minimal
awareness of ongoing growth.
Does not provide a clear
reflection or vision for the
future self. Lacks meaningful
discussion of ethics, values, or
strategies for navigating
uncertainty. No evidence of
connection to ethical
approaches or commitment to
growth.



(rubric continues on the next page)



Overall integration of relevant theory, literature from the unit, evidence; structure, flow, connection between sections (20 %), equivalent to 6 marks) L01, L04

Integration and
application of evidence, relevant
theories and literature
explicitly from Theme 1
modules – in Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4
(3 marks)

Exceptional integration of
evidence, theories and literature
from BUSS2000; applied
in an exceptional, evidence-
informed ways with in-
depth evaluation / critiques.
Strong integration
between use of evidence,
theories and literature from
BUSS2000; applied in ways that
provide insight, with some
strong
evaluation / critiques.

Good integration of
appropriate theories,
evidence and literature
and applied with good
insights and attempts at
evaluation / critique
Limited evidence, theories and
literature with
marginal or superficial in relevance
– are mainly
described rather than
applied or evaluated.
No evidence, theory or
literature
used, or the theory
/Literature used is not from
BUSS2000 Theme 1 content /
irrelevant.
Written structure, internal
flow and connection of all parts of
assignment (3 marks)
Demonstrates a highly eloquent,
well-polished written analysis with
excellent structure; clear and
sophisticated links between all
sections. Follows assignment
instructions.
Logically organised
with careful attention to detail,
clarity of thought, structure
and written flow is
demonstrated consistently.
Mostly follows assignment
instructions.
Good structure and is
coherent in parts, with
mostly logical flow between
sections. Mostly follows
assessment instructions.
Organised in an adequate
way with some logic / flow
between sections, although
unbalanced. Some attempt to
follow assessment instructions.
Poorly organised,
incoherent or no connection
between sections. Does not
follow assessment
instructions.

References and Appendices (5%, equivalent to 1.5 mark)

Citations & Referencing (1 mark)
(APA 7th Guidelines:
https://www.library.sydney.edu.a
u/support/referencing/apa-7th)
Follows the APA 7 guidelines / no
errors in referencing
Consistently accurate. Mostly accurate. Some attempt at
referencing.
No referencing.
Comprehensive Appendix (0.5) Attaches evidence from class activities to support parts 1,2,3 and 4 No appendix
AI Disclosure (NA) Yes/No
(End of rubric)



学霸联盟