MIS100_Assessment_3_Brief Page 1 of 6


ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS100 Foundations of Information Systems
Assessment Task Digital Debate: Issues on Professional Ethics
Individual/Group Group
Length 10–15 minutes
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
completion of the task below include:
c) Apply ethical and professional standards to information
system challenges in business contexts.
d) Collaborate to propose solutions to real-world information
systems-related business challenges.
Submission 12-week duration:
Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 11 (Week 11)
6-week duration:
Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 11 (Week 6)
4-week duration:
Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 11 (Week 4)
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 100 marks (100 marks unless it is a quiz assessment task)

Assessment Task
For this group assessment, you will deliver a digital debate presentation on a current ethical or
strategic issue related to information systems (ISs). Building on Assessment 2, your group will take a
clear stance on the topic and support it using real-world IS concepts, ethical frameworks and
sustainability principles. In your preparation, you will use Generative AI (GenAI) tools and include
their use in your group presentation.
Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

Context
In today’s digital business environment, organisations face complex ethical and strategic challenges
involving ISs, from AI-driven decision making to sustainability trade-offs and workforce automation.


MIS100_Assessment_3_Brief Page 2 of 6

This assessment invites you to evaluate these dilemmas through a structured group debate in which
you critically apply ethical reasoning to explore multiple perspectives and justify your position using
real-world IS concepts.
Through collaboration, your team will plan, coordinate and deliver a persuasive digital presentation
that mirrors professional scenarios such as stakeholder negotiations. You will strengthen your oral
communication by presenting complex ideas clearly and confidently, and build your digital literacy
by integrating GenAI tools to enhance, critique and reflect on your arguments. These SMART SKILLS
are essential for navigating the evolving digital workplace with integrity and impact.

Instructions
For this assessment task, you will deliver a group debate presentation on an ethical or strategic issue
in ISs. You will take a clear stance, apply IS concepts and use GenAI tools to support your
presentation.

To complete your digital group debate, follow the steps below.
Step 1: Form a Group
• Form a group of 2–4 students.
• Refer to the Group Formation Guidelines for instructions on registering your group.

Step 2: Select a Debate Topic
Choose one of the following ethical or strategic IS topics:
 The organisation’s use of AI-driven customer analytics raises serious ethical concerns about
data privacy.
 Employee displacement due to automation is an unavoidable and acceptable consequence
of digital transformation.
 Smart technology in industry creates more sustainability hype than real impact.
 Digital loyalty programs undermine sustainability by encouraging more consumption, not
less.
 GenAI should be used in customer service roles, even if it replaces human interactions.
Groups may also propose their own topic, but it must be approved by the learning facilitator.

Step 3: Prepare Your Debate
• Carefully review your Assessment 2 case study and task brief to ensure your arguments are
grounded in the context of your prior analysis.
• Clearly define your position on the topic.
• Apply relevant IS concepts and technologies to justify your stance.
• Prepare structured arguments and rebuttals to opposing views.

Step 4: Integrate GenAI Tools
• Use GenAI to support your preparation (e.g., brainstorming visual design and simulating
stakeholder perspectives).


MIS100_Assessment_3_Brief Page 3 of 6

• Include a slide titled ‘Group AI Discussion’, explaining how you used GenAI ethically and
responsibly.

Step 5: Structure the Presentation
Plan a 10–15 minute presentation with the following format:
• opening statements
• main arguments
• rebuttals
• conclusion.
Ensure each member actively contributes. Use at least four visuals or slides to enhance clarity and
engagement. The recorded video file should clearly show the slide presentation.
Step 6: Rehearse and Record
• Rehearse as a group to ensure smooth delivery and timing.
• Record your final debate using MS Teams or equivalent.
• Ensure all members are visible on camera and the video is clear, well-paced and within the
time limit.
Step 7: Peer Evaluations
• Complete an individual Peer Evaluation Form of your group members.
• Submit your evaluation privately as instructed.
Submission Instructions
Your Digital Group Debate should be presented as a 10–15-minute video recording in MP4 format.
Only ONE member needs to submit the video recording on behalf of the group. The peer evaluation
form needs to be submitted individually.
Submit this task via Assessments > Briefs & Submissions in the main navigation menu in MIS100:
Information Systems in the Digital Age.
Your marked assessment can be viewed in MyLearn.

Referencing
It is essential that you use current APA style for citing and referencing the sources that you use.
Please see more information on citing and referencing guidelines on the Academic Success webpage.

Assessment Support
For a range of additional resources and support to help you complete your assessment, please
consult the Study Support page on the Student Hub.




MIS100_Assessment_3_Brief Page 4 of 6

Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that their submitted work is original, adheres to academic
writing standards outlined in the Torrens University Academic Writing Guide, and is appropriately
referenced according to the guidelines provided in the Torrens University APA Referencing Guide.
Students need to have read and be aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity
Policy, Academic Integrity Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. For more
information, please refer to the Academic Integrity guidelines and the Torrens University Library.
Students must also keep all required evidence in making an assessment; a copy of all submitted
material and any assessment drafts.
Generative AI
Please refer to the Torrens University Library for guidance on the use of Generative AI. Please speak
to your learning facilitator regarding the use of GenAI tools in your assessments.

Assessment Due Dates and Late Penalties
Assessments may be submitted on or before the due date. Late penalties apply for assessments that
are submitted after the due date.
Refer to:
• Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework (HE) and ELICOS
Torrens University | Think Education
• Assessment Special Consideration Guidelines for Students (HE Coursework)
Torrens University | Think Education
• Student Hub for Assessment Extension Information.

Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment task or exam due to
unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Special Consideration
Guidelines for Students


MIS100_Assessment_3_Brief Page 5 of 6

Assessment Rubric
Assessment Criteria
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85–100%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75–84%
Credit
(Proficient)
65–74%
Pass
(Functional)
50–64%
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0–49%
Argument Clarity
and Depth

Percentage for this
criterion = 30%
Position is clearly
articulated and strongly
argued. Arguments are
insightful, persuasive and
grounded in theory and
evidence. Rebuttals are
well structured and
enhance the case.
Position is clearly articulated
and strongly argued.
Arguments are insightful,
persuasive and grounded in
theory and evidence.
Rebuttals are well structured
and enhance the case.
Position is understandable
with moderately strong
arguments. Some evidence
and rebuttals included.
Basic stance provided.
Arguments may lack
depth or clarity. Rebuttals
are limited.
Unclear or weak position.
Arguments are
unsupported or
disorganised. No effective
rebuttals.
Application of IS
Concepts and Ethical
Frameworks
Percentage for this
criterion = 30%
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of IS
concepts and integrates
ethical and sustainability
perspectives expertly.
Theory-practice links are
strong.
IS concepts and ethical issues
are well applied and relevant.
Connections to theory are
evident.
IS concepts and ethical
issues are well applied and
relevant. Connections to
theory are evident.
Minimal or general
references to IS or ethics.
Weak theoretical
grounding.
No meaningful use of IS or
ethical frameworks. Theory
missing or incorrect.
Use of GenAI Tools
Percentage for this
criterion = 15%
AI tools are used ethically
and strategically. Group
clearly explains use,
evaluation and integration
of AI. Reflection is critical
and relevant.
Good use of GenAI with clear
explanation. Some critical
reflection provided.
Basic AI use explained.
Reflection limited but
present.
Superficial or unclear AI
use. Little to no reflection.
No mention of AI use or
unethical application.


MIS100_Assessment_3_Brief Page 6 of 6

Presentation Quality
and Communication

Percentage for this
criterion = 15%
Highly engaging and
professional delivery.
Excellent timing, slide
design, voice clarity and
visual impact. Strong
group presence and
audience focus.
Clear and confident delivery.
Visuals enhance
understanding. Minor issues
in timing or clarity.
Adequate delivery. Visuals
used but may lack impact or
polish. Some unevenness in
pacing.
Basic delivery with limited
engagement. Visuals
underused or unclear.
Poorly delivered. Lacks
structure, clarity or visual
support.
Working well with
others

Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
Clear evidence of
balanced, collaborative
effort. All members
contribute confidently and
cohesively. Strong
coordination and team
synergy.
Effective collaboration with
mostly balanced input.
Transitions and teamwork are
smooth.
Reasonable collaboration.
Some imbalances in terms
of contribution but effort is
evident.
Basic collaboration shown.
Some members dominate
or their participation is
limited.
Poor collaboration.
Teamwork disjointed or
one-sided.


学霸联盟