APG5082 Assessment 1: Creative Positioning Statement (Marking Rubric) Marking Criteria HD D C P N Articulation of creative practice and values (25%) • Compelling and nuanced articulation of creative practice, themes, and driving values. • Demonstrates sophisticated self- awareness, evident throughout. • Demonstrates clear awareness of what differentiates their approach (cultural background, networks, skills, philosophical commitments). • Clear articulation of creative practice, themes, and values. • Identifies distinctive perspective with clarity and self- awareness. • Explains what differentiates them from peers. • Adequate description of creative practice and values. • Demonstrates reasonable self- awareness. • Identifies some differentiating factors. Positioning is present but could be more developed or specific. • Basic articulation of creative practice, though may be somewhat general. • Some elements of values and drivers identified with limited depth of reflection. • Limited explanation of what makes their approach particular. Positioning is somewhat unclear. • Unclear or generic articulation of creative practice. • Values and drivers insufficiently developed, lacks authentic engagement with own work. • Fails to articulate distinctive perspective or claims only generic distinctiveness. Engagement with field and community (25%) • Sophisticated understanding of positioning within creative sector/cultural community. • Identifies peers, collaborators, influences, and conversations with specificity. • Articulates how they want to contribute with clarity and nuance. • Good understanding of field and community context. • Identifies relevant peers and conversations. • Explains their positioning within the field reasonably well. • Demonstrates basic awareness of creative field or community. • Identifies some relevant context. • Engagement is somewhat general or could be more developed. • Limited engagement with field or community context. • May identify peers or conversations but without depth. • Positioning within field is unclear. • Shows little understanding of creative field or community. • Fails to articulate positioning within context. Vision and future direction (25%) • Articulates clear, thoughtful vision grounded in stated values and practice. • Vision encompasses strategic thinking (commercial, community, experimental, or hybrid approaches). • Demonstrates realistic and developed sense of creative trajectory. • Articulates reasonably clear vision for creative future. • Vision connects to practice and values. • Some strategic thinking evident. • Articulates a vision for creative future. • Connection to broader positioning may be somewhat general. • Vision is present but could be more developed. • Basic articulation of future direction. • Vision may be somewhat generic or lack clear connection to practice. • Vision is unclear, generic, or disconnected from stated creative practice and values. Marking Criteria HD D C P N Written expression, presentation and referencing (25%) • Integrates minimum three high-quality, relevant sources. • Strong synthesis of sources with student's own thinking. • Written expression skilfully communicates meaning with clarity and fluency. • Accurate citing and referencing throughout. • Submission adheres to presentation requirements and word limit. • Integrates three relevant sources. • Generally strong integration with adequate critical engagement. • Written expression generally conveys meaning clearly. • Citing and referencing generally appropriate and accurate. • Submission adheres to presentation requirements and word limit. • Includes three sources that are broadly relevant. • Sources present but critical engagement could be deeper. • Written expression generally conveys meaning, although may contain some errors. • Some errors in citing and referencing may persist. • Submission generally adheres to presentation requirements and/or is slightly over or under word limit. • Includes three sources but relevance or quality may be limited. • Integration is attempted but may be unclear or disconnected from main argument. • Written expression is inconsistent and inaccurate in parts, somewhat impeding meaning. • Citing and referencing attempted but may be faulty. • Submission sometimes adheres to presentation requirements and/or is over or under word limit. • Fewer than three sources OR sources are poorly selected, irrelevant, or minimally engaged with. • Numerous errors and inaccuracies in written expression. • Referencing consistently inaccurate or not attempted. • Submission does not adhere to presentation requirements and/or is substantially over or under word limit. Total: /100 Comments:
学霸联盟