MKTG 6998 — Social Media Analysis Group Project Proposal University of Sydney Business School Due: Week 7 (Presentation + Written Report) 1. Overview The Group Project Proposal is the first of two major group assessments in this course. It requires your team to present and submit a research proposal for the final project you will complete later in the semester. The proposal should demonstrate that your team has identified a meaningful research question in social media marketing, grounded it in relevant literature, and developed a feasible plan to collect social media data to address it. This is your opportunity to receive early feedback from your instructor and peers before committing to the full project. A strong proposal sets the foundation for a strong final project. 2. What You Will Deliver 2.1 Video Presentation • Duration: 10–15 minutes. • Format: Record a polished team presentation (slides + voiceover or camera). All team members must participate visibly or audibly. • Upload: Upload the video to YouTube as an Unlisted video and share the link with your instructor. All video links will then be shared with the class so that peers can watch and prepare questions. • Submission: Submit the YouTube link via the course portal by the Week 7 deadline. 2.2 Written Report • Length: 2,000–3,000 words (excluding references and appendices). • Format: PDF, 12 pt font, 1.5 line spacing, APA 7th edition referencing. • Submission: Submit via the course portal by the Week 7 deadline. 3. What to Present & Write Your proposal is a plan for the final group project. It should convince the audience that your team has a clear, important, and feasible research idea. Your research question and data must be related to social media marketing. The proposal should cover the following components: Research Question. State your research question clearly. Explain what you aim to investigate and why it matters to marketing theory and/or practice. The question should be specific enough to be answerable within one semester, and it must be grounded in a social media marketing context. Importance and Motivation. Why does this question matter? Provide motivation from industry trends, real-world cases, or gaps in existing knowledge. Connect the question to broader themes in social media marketing. Literature Review. Summarise the most relevant academic literature (minimum 8–10 sources). Citations must be drawn primarily from top-tier research journals in marketing, specifically journals on the FT50 (Financial Times Top 50) and UTD (UT Dallas Top 100) lists — for example, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Marketing Science, Journal of Consumer Research, Management Science, and Information Systems Research. Identify the gap your project will address and explain how your work contributes to the field. All citations will be verified for authenticity and journal quality. Papers from non-ranked journals, predatory journals, or fabricated references will result in point deductions. Data Collection Plan. Describe your social media data sources (e.g., platform APIs, web scraping, existing datasets). Specify the type of data you will collect, the platform(s), time period, sample size, and any ethical considerations (e.g., privacy, platform terms of service). Your data should come from or relate to social media platforms. Analytical Methods (Preliminary Thinking). At this stage, you are not expected to have finalised your analytical approach — the causal inference methods (A/B testing, PSM, DID, RDD, IV, Synthetic Control) will be covered in detail from Weeks 8 to 11. However, you should begin thinking about what type of method you might need to answer your research question. Importantly, your question should require a causal answer, not merely a correlational one (see Section 4 below). Note: the methods section will not be evaluated in this proposal. You will have the opportunity to refine and finalise your methodology after completing the causal inference modules. Feasibility Evaluation. Provide a realistic assessment of your project's feasibility. This section should include: (1) Key difficulties and challenges you anticipate (e.g., data access limitations, sample size constraints, identification issues, technical skills required). (2) An estimated time budget — how many total hours do you expect the project to require, and how will the workload be distributed across team members? (3) A week-by-week project timetable from Week 7 to Week 13, specifying what tasks will be completed each week, who is responsible, and the expected deliverables. A well-thought-out timetable demonstrates that your team understands the scope of the project and has a concrete plan to deliver on time. Example Timetable Format: Week Tasks Responsible Est. Hours 7 Submit proposal; incorporate feedback All — 8 Begin data collection; set up API access Member A & B 10 9 Complete data collection; clean & preprocess Member A & B 12 10 Exploratory analysis; finalise causal method Member C & D 10 11 Run causal analysis; robustness checks All 15 12 Write report; prepare presentation All 15 13 Final presentation & submission All 8 4. Thinking Causally, Not Correlationally A central goal of this course is to move beyond correlational analysis and develop the ability to make causal claims about social media phenomena. Understanding the difference is critical for designing your project. A correlational finding tells you that two things tend to move together. For example, you might observe that brands with more Instagram followers also have higher sales. But does having more followers actually cause higher sales? Or do successful brands simply attract more followers? Perhaps a third factor — such as advertising spend — drives both. Correlation alone cannot distinguish between these explanations. A causal finding, by contrast, identifies whether one variable actually produces a change in another, holding all else equal. Establishing causation requires a credible research design that addresses confounding factors — for example, exploiting a natural experiment, matching treated and control units on observable characteristics, or leveraging a sharp discontinuity in treatment assignment. The methods you will learn in Weeks 8–11 (A/B testing, propensity score matching, difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, instrumental variables, and synthetic control) are all designed to help you move from "X and Y are correlated" to "X causes Y." When formulating your research question, ask yourself: "Am I trying to show that X causes Y, or merely that X and Y are associated?" Your project should aim for the former. Even at the proposal stage, you should be thinking about what makes a convincing causal argument — even if you have not yet decided on the specific method. 5. Connecting to Course Content Your project should integrate knowledge from across the semester. The table below maps course topics to potential project elements: Weeks Topics Covered Relevance to Your Project 1–2 Data Collection & Preprocessing Foundations for working with social media data — text cleaning, data structures, quality checks 3–5 SEO, Keyword Strategy, Platform Algorithms, Google Ads API Research contexts — search behaviour, content optimisation, ad performance; API access for programmatic data collection (introduced in Week 5) 6–7 GEO, AI Search, Content Strategy Emerging topics — AI-generated content, zero-click search, brand reputation in AI search 8–10 A/B Testing, PSM, DID, RDD, IV, Synthetic Control Your analytical toolkit — causal inference methods to be covered after the proposal deadline 11–12 KOL/Influencer Analysis, Social Networks Research contexts — influencer effectiveness, network effects, fake KOL detection 6. Example Research Directions The following are illustrative examples to inspire your thinking. You are encouraged to develop your own original question. Note how each example frames the question causally rather than correlationally. • Does influencer-generated content causally increase brand search volume? (e.g., DID around campaign launch dates) • What is the causal effect of Google AI Overviews on organic click-through rates for e-commerce brands? (e.g., RDD on rollout thresholds) • Do TikTok viral moments lead to sustained SEO gains or only temporary traffic spikes? (e.g., Synthetic control) • Does responding to negative reviews on social media improve subsequent ratings? (e.g., PSM on response vs. no-response) • What is the incremental effect of KOL endorsements on product sales, controlling for selection bias? (e.g., IV or PSM) 7. Evaluation Criteria Important: Analytical Methods carries 0% weight in the proposal assessment. Since causal inference methods will be taught from Weeks 8 to 11, you are not expected to have a finalised methodology at this stage. Focus your effort on the research question, motivation, literature review, data collection plan, and feasibility evaluation. Component What We're Looking For Weight (%) Research Question Clarity, originality, and relevance to social media marketing theory/practice 25% Importance and Motivation Justification of why the question matters, supported by industry or theoretical reasoning 15% Literature Review Use of top-tier FT50/UTD journal sources; clear gap identification; contribution to knowledge. All citations will be checked for authenticity and journal quality — non-ranked or fabricated sources will be penalised. 15% Data Collection Plan Clear description of social media data sources, methods, feasibility, and ethical considerations 20% Analytical Methods Preliminary thinking about causal (not correlational) approach — not graded, for feedback only 0% Feasibility Evaluation Identification of key difficulties, realistic time estimates, and a detailed week-by-week project timetable with task assignments 25% 8. Submission Checklist • ☐ YouTube video uploaded as Unlisted; link submitted via course portal • ☐ Written report submitted as PDF via course portal • ☐ All team members credited and contributed to the presentation • ☐ References formatted in APA 7th edition • ☐ Video is 10–15 minutes in length • ☐ Research question and data are social media marketing related • ☐ Feasibility section includes difficulties, time estimates, and a week-by-week timetable
学霸联盟