Assessment Task 5 Case Study Analysis Semester 2 2021 Criteria HD 80% - 100% D 79% - 70% CR 69% - 60% P 59 – 50% N 1. Writing and organization Note: required components of the case study analysis: Title of document; Introduction, Case Analysis; Recommendations; and References (in-text and end-text) using the Harvard system. Your case study is well organized because you made excellent selections with respect to the following: Your case study is sufficiently organized because: Your case study is not sufficiently organized because:  All aspects of the writing conform to a high professional standard.  All aspects of the formatting of the case study conform to a high professional standard.  Most aspects of the writing conform to a high professional standard.  Most aspects of the formatting of the case study conform to a high professional standard.  Most aspects of the writing conform to an acceptable professional standard.  Most aspects of the formatting of the case study conform to an acceptable professional standard.  The writing is presented with a basic structure.  The formatting of the case study conforms to a basic structure.  The writing is not of a professional standard.  The formatting of the case study is not of a professional standard. 2. Your assignment asks you to address the following requirements: (a) Analyse how well, or otherwise, BHP Ltd, discharged its accountability to its stakeholders with respect to the following GRI standards for the year ended 30 June 2019.  GRI 102 Disclosure: 102-3, 102-4, 102-7, and 102-11.  GRI 201 Economic Performance: 201-1 and 201-2.  GRI 303 Water-and-effluents: 303-3 a (i) and (ii) and (iii) and (d).  GRI 305 Emissions: 305-1 (a) (b) and (g) and 305-2 (a) and (g).  GRI 306 Waste: 306-3.  GRI 403 Occupational health and safety: 403-2, 403-3 and 403-4. Note, BHP (2019 p. 6) states that its sustainability report is prepared in accordance with the Comprehensive approach to complying with the GRI Standards (see page 5 of GRI 102). (b) Based on the analysis you undertook in (a) above, assess how well the company met its accountability in relation to the following GRI reporting principles (GRI 101: Foundation): materiality, completeness, clarity and comparability. You are to assume that you are a socially responsible investor (SRI) who expects the company to report fully on the GRI disclosures identified in (a) above. Note, the GRI-related issues addressed in part (a) above and this part (b) do not cover all aspects of BHP’s Sustainability Report. You will need to acknowledge that fact as a limitation of your assessment of how well BHP met the reporting principles. (c) Make key recommendations to the board of directors of BHP with respect to them discharging their accountability to you and other stakeholders based on your findings in (b) above; and explain why it is important that the company adopt the recommendations. All aspects of the assignment topic were addressed and researched in great depth. The case study shows evidence of analysis, evaluation and interpretation. It demonstrates a good understanding of the subject matter and context. Most aspects of the assignment topic were addressed and researched in great depth. Most aspects of the assignment topic were addressed and researched adequately. Key aspects of the assignment were addressed and researched adequately. The case study is superficial and / or inadequately addressed and researched the topic.  The case study demonstrates great depth of analysis, evaluation and interpretation. It demonstrates a deep and broad understanding of the issues raised in the assignment requirements.  The case study shows some evidence of analysis, evaluation and interpretation. It demonstrates a good understanding of the subject matter and context.  The case study shows acceptable levels of analytical capacity and logical rigor.  The case study shows a basic understanding of the situation.  The case study demonstrates limited understanding of the subject matter. 3. You support your claims with appropriate sources. You compile a reference list from assigned readings and use correct and consistent citation format. You include in-text citations (Harvard system) in your case study. You attach a reference list at the end of your case study. You include in-text citations and attach a reference list at the end of your case study. You include some in-text citations and a partial reference list. Your in-text citations and reference list are incomplete.  Your references are well chosen and illustrate your points. You make use of the authors’ arguments to support your claims.  Your outside sources are highly relevant for illustrating your points.  Your citations are correctly formatted.  Your references are sufficiently related to your analysis. You make some use of the authors’ arguments to support your claims.  Your outside sources are somewhat relevant for illustrating your points.  Your citations are mostly correctly formatted.  Your references are poorly related to your analysis.  Your outside sources do not support your points.  Your citations are inconsistently formatted.