Untitled Note
Fri, 3/11 11:02AM 2:37:15
SUMMARY KEYWORDS
argument, article, question, writing, point, claim, academic writing, citation, position, reader,
reference management software, academic, software, footnotes, legal, review, express, author,
sentence, cite
00:10
This so I helped to drop in sessions to discuss that. Slash book review. Total only eight
students. The opportunity though many of you communicated with me by email. I hope that
use the individual consultations to this class, extended essay outline. I do prefer to talk about
the book special article review. It's okay. It's just that I think it would be more suitable for you.
The outline. Now I have received 100 emails in the past week from students because of the
flags and call me that I teach face to face. It is very challenging. So if you have emailed me and
I forgot an answer, or I accidentally missed your email, let me follow up and answer later today.
I'm really sorry. It's just been almost a normal week in my academic life. There are so many
things going on in many of my students have been impacted some of them and some of you
severely by floods. And I had to deal with many COVID cases, close contact and so forth. So if I
have if email accidentally slipped through the cracks, just shoot me an email after class today
and now and so you need me Yeah, it considered your time too. Is there anyone who hasn't
booked a consultation yet? It's trying to book a consultation. It's just that I cleared one of the
slots today so I can have a break. I realize I booked four hours of zoom for of collaborate on
collaborate for myself. And not to feel that this sub shanann Are you trying to just you can
replace them that's okay. Can you hear me? You're doing that. Okay, if you put your I'm just
allow me to have the 342 Four is just on sorry. Okay. I just saw this right up, right. Okay, thank
you. Um, so what I thought about doing is you've listened to the recorded materials, but I just
thought about sharing that I would share my personal tips which are very similar to Lucas's
because Academic Writing is a style. I would like to talk a bit about of sources because many of
you didn't have an orientation, including the library orientation. So I just wanted to direct to to
the support services and not and then I want to compare assessment, assessment one and
assessment to to understand the difference between the two tasks, tasks and in a way also
each task of you. Is this okay? He said access to the consultations is for the designated
sessions on collaborate. I'll sit in the room and come and go, come and go. Just make sure you
join on time to allow the person to have one on one time to speak up for you. A bit about me
Crytek, which is a very distinct style, but as someone who has been trained not in law and I still
write my articles are not in as a discipline.
04:02
I just wanted to clarify that because I'm writing these a style so it's not there's nothing right or
wrong about how you write it, but also legal academic writing is very particular. It's both
academic and it's a bit more. What's required. Structured writing, stands you in good stead to
academic and it's a bit more. What's required. Structured writing, stands you in good stead to
write. Legal articles tend to be longer than articles. In social sciences or humanities tend to be
heavily footnoted so when you others when you open academic legal scholarship articles, you
will realize that 80% of the page is good notes, and it's very common.
04:50
Certainly writing is very particular and I've seen that many of you struggle with identifying
what's a Scolari party piece and what is not. And I think it's a good exercise the book review in
an art slash article review, that exposes you to the variety of forms that exist or outlets that
exist and require you to make an assessment to determine whether a certain journal or
publication is academic or not. And there are many journals that IT professionals and
professionals as opposed to academics. scholarly writing is all about making an art play. was
required is not this description or an overview? The author needs to have a voice to be
expressing an idea. They take a position or contribute to a certain debate. of many persons
when they start writing academically, me included write descriptions or overviews is when you
lack confidence as a writer or when you're not familiar with a field. It's very hard to send
opinion it's much easier to rely on others. But in academic writing, having an argument is
crucial. Okay, the step for making an argument is certifying. What is the question or the issue,
you're dealing with concrete terms. What is the answer? One question. We'll be exploring in the
piece and it needs to be in the question in a in a clear way. What also what also is required?
What authors are also required to express are expected to do to make clear the stakes. What is
this question? What has this question being raised? And does it matter? Why are people
arguing about this question? So this is extremely important in academic writing, explaining
what are the stakes why does it matter what question to begin with and why people are so
busy. be arguing about these questions, debating this question with suppliers that academics
always assume that there is a debate or a discussion and that there is a multiplicity of
interlocutors of persons that are involved. In the in the discussion and around writing for the
people who are involved in the discussion and our readers oftentimes. So is required of you as
an author is to identify who are who you are talking with which this debate or discussion you're
intervening process enable you map the key approaches or views of the approaches that are
used the projects that are taken by different interlocutors or the different views that are
expressed by them. This is also important so when you present the question and the stakes are
doing this, you need to also explain who else is engaged in the discussion. But RDP approaches,
they are the views. And you need to present your argument to be a well structured and this is
especially important in legal writing. Senshi ated. Again, it's really important, especially in
coordinate systems where citations intentionality or these are citations. Citing is a key practice.
And you might need to be persuasive. Okay. So by describing or overviewing
09:43
be highly aware of your target audience who you're talking to. You need to write to your
audience to your readers. If to take them. Journey is I will explain five minutes. When thank
your argument, you should be really careful not to overclaim or underplay what I mean by
under claim.
10:23
Is that part about having kind of a unconfident voice so using things like may using things I
Is that part about having kind of a unconfident voice so using things like may using things I
could? Yeah, yeah. So and sending me
10:35
a clear voice did you?
10:47
Yes, sorry. I didn't hear that part. It just
10:50
crept up on me. I think you were interrupted. So I asked if you love having a boss.
10:57
Sorry. So I just said that when people sit up I think Mueller said sit on the fence or just getting
language.
11:07
For what else could be an example of either claiming an offense is a great extent but also this
idea of speaking with could may might need to have a position.
11:26
Also, potentially, just not finding the evidence to be able to make the significant claim like if it's
sort of something that's maybe relatively well known, but you need to have a source for it, find
the source to back it up so that then you can say with different sets of definitiveness what it is
that you're trying to bring,
11:46
because prep work and I spoke a bit about this in the talk in sessions is the main challenge that
one faces as an author didn't choose the right question. If you didn't clarify the question. If it's
a question that is not that interesting, is right. And you will under claim because there isn't
much to work with. For example, many people certainly articles, academic pieces that were
very short. And our response to them was this is a pandemic writing. However, a call is so short
that you might not have enough to work with or to engage with it will work against you because
you won't be able to raise interesting claims right in your review. And in this situation, you may
end up undermining. Yeah, other examples so send especially in the beginning, it's really hard
to go fulfill to be forceful right to make an argument to take a position to have a voice. And
students tend to focus on the description or the overview or the analysis and they don't really
clearly express a position and this situation they tend to under claim, right. So don't be afraid
to play your position is meant by overclaiming. Hey there
13:40
um, I think that was something that was mentioned in the video that when perhaps you're
being too critical or yeah, when not showing respect as opposed to the writer. But he also
mentioned that it's good to kind of overstate to begin with so that you understand your voice
that I kind of took it took his meaning and then you go back and perhaps kind of wind it back a
little bit.
14:16
It's interesting that you the word respect, something that I wanted to discuss. Exactly. Did you
mean when you say you do not express respect when you for a claim or not? Well, I
14:29
suppose an enormous amount of research goes into, into any sort of academic piece, and these
are people who are obviously extremely knowledgeable on their subject matter. So you know,
the act of being, of analyzing and critiquing doesn't mean necessarily, you have to be critical.
14:55
So Heather's saying you need to be charitable, which is a word that academics would often use
in the sense that when you engage with others, because oftentimes, right, through a
conversation with another author, right, you engage in a conversation and through this
conversation expressing Express position you need to be charitable with the other person. Your
ad I think mailers referred to this in the comments. Of you mean by being due to definitive in
the position to black and white.
15:35
The law is shrouded in shade shades of gray and if you if you take too harsh a position you you
may be right on a on a very small part of it, but the larger part of what you're talking about,
you may miss the point
15:54
if this is true about one's own position. But so you should be careful about attributing making
generalizations or not delving too deeply into another author's position. It goes both ways. So
Heather pointed out you need to be charitable with your interlocutor, words, your interlocutor
and understanding that and you need to assume that their position is sophisticated. Basa need
to produce a sophisticated claim yourself and avoid making generalizations because
generalization that what once what may happen if you make a generalization when you have a
position or when you express at a tentative view Heather
16:51
I suppose do you open yourself up to you expose yourself to and yeah, I don't know. Yeah.
Yeah.
17:08
To think right. Why if you make it easy for others to attack you or criticize you why to think this
point implied
17:30
absolute will if you're it doesn't make your argument particularly balanced either.
17:40
Sammy argue that you're because every argument is situated and is normative. Some may use
this to against you to claim that you're biased or that not neutral though of course knowing is
neutral. So it may you your argument can be criticized easily, right. all someone needs to do is
to find the one concrete example that doesn't prove the role. So you take a strong position, it
easy for people to criticize the argument internally. So all they have to do is do the empirical
work. An example that doesn't work effectively. When it comes to shake your argument, oh, life
tends to be messy. So when you make broad arguments, yes, assume that life is not messy,
which again makes it easy to find examples that feel that your argument is not nuanced.
nuanced, or so to get it.
18:56
Got a question? Oh, yes, I almost finished my response. And there are some parts or some
points that I've been missing, but due to the word limit, if I pull a table, I may not be able to
conclude my point of the response server that affect my schools.
19:19
But there is no right or wrong answer right. I cannot sit with a calculator. I want you to answer
the question. We talked about what renders writing effective web What do you think? Well, you
answered your question. By friends when you attempt to cover all points.
19:52
19:52
You're not going to have the right level of sophistication and depth to try and cover everything
that you only deal with the issues in a very harmful way that you're not going to be able to get
recognized where there's limits to the argument you making.
20:13
Not able to go into depth. So you cover everything like briefly or then your risk of producing
work that is not again, nuanced or sophisticated enough or you're not. You won't be able to be
charitable. You'll be too you might be uncomfortable with wrote the article that you're
reviewing, right so it be a strategy to try to cover all points Eric
20:49
Thank you. Oh, yes, I was trying to like be wise my my response
20:58
so what would if you need to go it will be even a good strategy to try to cover all the points.
21:09
No light, because light won't fade. I might not be able to go in depth to date specific topics that
I'm very interested in. And that could be a light that could make my restaurant maybe too
superficial, because I tried to raise all the aspects of the like article. It also will
21:35
be very hard for you to lead the reader it will be very confusing for the reader. If there is no
clear it would be a better strategy Eric
21:51
and me find like that'd be fine trying to find like the actual thesis statement or like the purpose
of the article and respond, respond to that point and then like, try to use the other points to
support the micro claims or like my response is that
22:17
he will try to find the key argument of the author. You choose a human you can either choose
an argument to engage with a claim to engage with you can choose the key arguments that
author is making. So that you want to show that you're aware of the other claims related claims
that they're that the authors made. Can you communicate that to your reader in this case? Or
techniques was raising your hand cannot see? Yeah, hi.
23:01
Y'all I have a question about what live is his like on Yes Yeah, I saw and I just it's really hard
because I need delayed more than 200 words so I can they like did footnotes include in the
word count, but then citation knowledge for
23:29
just a second, I'll answer a question and just want to finish an heiress question and then I'll
answer your question that okay, sorry, sorry. I wanted to help you. So let's say it's tempting for
you decided because you understood understood that that's the best strategy to focus on one
argument or on the key argument, but one to acknowledge that the author is making several
other claims or, or that certain other points are made. In the article, but you don't want to go
into this. Have you signal to the reader or aware of the other questions, but that's beyond the
scope of your analysis or your review.
24:15
Maybe have said that there are two points to consider to fully comprehend the topic or to fully
understand the point of the of the author, but in this like interest bond, I will be mainly focusing
on like the spread this protocol topic, but to fully comprehend like the point and do what you
should like the raters should kind of their rating, like otter like gray when information about the
about the topic is alright.
24:50
For this is one excellent strategy right clarifying beginning once you identify the argument that
you will engage with that of course, they are the author is making several other claims or that
there are certain claims that you will not go not engage with in detail and say, unexplained that
this is beyond these an engagement with these points with beyond the point of your analysis.
But at least you acknowledge in the main text that you're the author is making multiple
arguments or a much more complex argument. Can you have other tactics? Sorry, Eric,
everyone. But offers usually do. Include a footnote where they acknowledge the existence of a
certain claim, but note that engagement with this claim is beyond the scope of the piece of the
current piece. So there is also arguing that and get the data comma and engagement with this
claim is beyond the scope of my review. Is this okay to studies for sure, in respect but also
acknowledging the existence of other claims in an article review review, okay. So, bottom line
was, it's okay. It's not that I you won't be your mark will not would not be negatively affected if
you don't cover all points. And is that a strong argument? is focused on certain claims, and then
the writing is more effective and clearer and the reader is able to follow your piece.
26:51
26:51
Thank you so much.
26:54
So you'll have you asked me another question. What can one do? When one finishes or relating
their claim, but there they need to add it? Because it's too long, right?
27:14
Yeah, because I was too long. I don't know how to delete at some point.
27:21
So let's think about it together. A text it's too long. We need to edit some parts out or we need
to shorten the text. And we surely short and indexed I can Nora
27:55
well, you It depends firstly, on how the article will be written but I'm usually one can just
overlooked article if there is like complicated language and words, which can be just crossed
out like a lot of passive sentences can be switched to active sentences, and that's usually
shorter than passive voice. Or another point, which is quite similar to what we did discussed
just before is if we have too many arguments, are we touching on each point we can just
acknowledge that there are arguments in in this regard, but the article does not address this.
So that that will be a really effective way to cut down the numbers of birds.
28:55
Right. So one fan and it's usually the case is that it will enable you to cut down the number of
words is to go over your language and simplify. I know that when you go to continental Europe,
for example, you will realize that the sentences in the quantum in Europe can be constructed to
be very long where in Anglophone literature, sentences need to be very short. It's also about
sophisticated the language is sometimes so. I would like to acknowledge that the DA and then
you can edit it to admittedly coma para da da da da. Da. You said three words. Yeah. Another
option, another strategy is to check if you actually discussed claims that are beyond the points.
So you date confirm that you stayed focus on the argument you are working with or engaging
with and eliminate discussion in questions that are interested but not relevant. You still want to
acknowledge the question? Then just add a footnote same passion. There is x is a question is
also a question. However, this question is beyond the scope of this. Of my review. I care it's for
reducing the number of words pointing outwards shitting. I'm sure you've had to shorten pieces
in the past
31:31
31:31
specifically, I guess a better way to express something or a more succinct way like you know, if
you use an adjective, for example, describe something that you just covered. It doesn't have
any meaning, or change the structure of the sentence.
31:50
He says something is becoming increasingly important from the adjective but you just say it's
become important. I don't know something like that. Like it's just small stuff. It doesn't add to
the main point then, you know, does it really need to be there and if the answer is no, then
later
32:07
send it over another extension on here. Also, I do.
32:12
For me, it's just about actually, you know, it's not due for another week. So if I were you, I
would walk away from it and come back in two days time and have another look over it.
Because it's yeah, it's amazing. How it sounds different in your head and how taking out some
words becomes easier. Once you've had a little bit of a break.
32:31
That's excellent advice. I need to do it. So if you feel that you can no longer edit it means that
you are to end goals that you have to in the text. Just if you have time and you've finished the
draft before the deadline. One excellent strategy is to take a step back. Say I'm to gain some
perspective. So I'm taking a step back and come back to it a day later and you'll realize that
things look different. Their speech helps me personally is printing out my text and bring it with
something you suddenly realize that there are a lot of redundant parts because when you work
on a computer and you work on the computer, it's really hard to get to have to have
perspective. So you do have the possibility of printing your graph. I highly recommend it. You
will then notice the repetitions or that certain parts are too convoluted. Other parts are too
verbose and you can make them more sustained. It really helps to read a hard copy of your
graph and strategies. I can give an advice when we start writing a tendency to quote at length.
Scholars I don't know is also your experience but they happen to me when I began my PhD and
then one of my supervisors, supervisors told me that that's enough. I understand why you
quote so much, but you are now the student need to rely on quotes and you do have quotes if
you do, you can edit the quotes and pick just to relevant the crucial parts from the quotes this
usually everyone is quotes that are too long I decided to point so just try to sentence from the
code that is key or the relevant phrase, what is relevant and cut everything else. So arc with
the quote instead of just including a long quote, a shorter well in your sentence Whoa.
Guaranteed for you. Thank you hey there. Um,
35:32
35:32
I have a question that's kind of unrelated. Um, but on the topic of assessment, one, if you've
got an article that is, you know, a couple of years old, and quite a lot of, you know, things have
happened since it seems like the article that I've that I've focused on kind of started a
sequence of things from happening in literature as well as, you know, some major major
developments in in a historical sense. All of the tips kind of focused on what the context of the
article was written in it. You know, what led up to the article. Do you think? Is it also relevant to
talk about how that article shapes things that have been written since or is that not
36:35
your answer? I think your question, what is the goal of the exercise? Why do you need to do?
Review the article right review
36:46
the article itself? Yeah. Okay.
36:48
So that's commenting on the article or presenting its impact. is not part of the exercise.
However, you use events that have to happen afterwards, or literature that engages with your
article to use your reviewer critique of the article. Right. It's a different thing to do, right.
Presenting the impact of recall is different than using mitigation that actually happened or
articles that built on drew on or criticized your article. To produce your review of your weekend
office. May I say no? Okay.
37:42
I think so. I think I can draw on more recent articles that cite my article in my in my critique
office,
37:56
in your engagement with it. The point is not to emphasize the impact of the article, you are
reviewing the article. Finding very helpful question. Sorry.
38:24
I also just wanted to ask in terms of the language I think one of the videos said that you can
use I you know, kind of the active rather than passive test
38:39
38:39
Yeah, so um, where you have did your undergrad, but in I can tell you that for them in
continental Europe, it's a no no. So remember my first class in Paris or not my first course in
Paris. I had a midterm assignment and I told them to conclude with their position and it made it
half an hour to convince them that it's okay to write I think that and it's not on them. It's just a
It's not only in writing until you become a full tenured professor, you don't write I think that but
in
39:17
fun,
39:19
legal scholarship, it is really common and there's absolutely no problem in writing. I think.
Someone raised their hand and I use that so I think that I think is very helpful is to think about
an argument as a journey on which you gain your reader every time you make a decision. So
stage of the argument is a crossroad. Where you to, to the direction to take and then you
choose the direction and move to the next step, which then becomes a new process is fine. You
situate the reader of the crossroad you need to include a signpost. Has anyone ever heard
about the term signposting know what it means?
40:33
I guess it's like at the beginning of a section Spang. In this section, I'm going to cover x y and
Zed. You know and it kind of creates like a structure like you know, for example, signposting is
like the introduction and set of articles gonna have three different arguments in which case,
you go to the first paragraph, it's my first argument, second is my second and third, so it's easy
to follow. It's just logical flow, but demonstrating it to a reader
40:58
extent or as the previous sections. Play as was claimed in the previous section kinda nanana
Nana, this raises the question of whether X or Y section I will explore I will consider that other
data because I don't. In the previous section showed in common law jurisdictions, there is an
equitable concept of trusts, which does not exist in civil law jurisdictions. This raises the
question of whether CV luxurious as this or that similar jurisdiction, adopt a similar concept. In
this section of the paper, I'll explore the different arguments for and against sash, this seat
assignment, right.
42:06
They're taking your reader by the hand and you need to explain the journey to them so that
they would understand where you're standing at each point. And where you're taking them
from now on where the cams were at them to that specific point. And look, we're gonna take
them from there. Okay.
42:37
So ideally in the beginning of each section, and at the end of the each section, you should
include a signpost. Getting off the side of the section, you should explain what will be done in
the section you need to or you need to what was done in the section where at what stage of the
argument you're at? Are there any questions? Remember, each stage of your argument is a
crossroad and each crossroad made sure to include a signpost in a whole paragraph or just a
sentence in the beginning of a paragraph. Key aspects of legal writing especially his use of
sources, every empirical claim has to be substantiated every position, claim or idea or board
borrowing from someone or drawing on high be attributed when author
44:02
make grant claims that are unsubstantiated. You In addition, you need to be very careful of
picking the sources that you draw on or cite. crucial in academic writing, exercise judgment to
evaluate the source. You need to evaluate the outlets slash publication is strategically,
tactically and also aware of the politics of citations for example, many academic reviewers
check to see that there is a representation in not that not only men from certain countries are
seen as one example but so many men are cited there. When they're cited, expanded, their
people are not binary and so forth. So a lot of people really engage with the politics of citations.
I really recommend that you consider booking a consultation with a law librarian. I put the link
outside of the library on good to Moodle, and they can help you with your research. This is their
profession and there's this is their expertise. So if you're new to academic writing, especially
but as you're many of many of you are new to legal rights. I really recommend booking the one
on one session, a lot library referencing each discipline and each an act on referencing style
embedding is used in law in Australia is that Australian Guide legal citation aglc and put it a link
to the aglc have posted a link to Moodle. And assessment, outline and submission. Okay. I
recommend considering downloading a reference management software now there are many
on the market. That Mendeley is that they also use, they also offer to generate food in aglc but
a reference management software is that you want Valient
46:53
Samantha from lofta.
46:56
Francesca
46:58
Yeah, isn't it just like a piece of software I think I used to Torah which will just kind of rip the
older referencing materials. And generally they'll like it'll have just like what format Do you
want these to be put in? And yeah, it just makes creating a like bibliography and footnotes just
want these to be put in? And yeah, it just makes creating a like bibliography and footnotes just
1000 times quicker
47:22
so using the software you create a folder and space of all the resources that you work on.
Enable the software usually enables you to also categorize your source as the software
software asked, asked you to input it to input information about each publication. And then
usually you also have a plugin that you can install. For example, on Word, Microsoft Word, and
while you might ask the software to generate a citations and each time you add a citation using
the software, it follows the convention. So first it will be a full citation. And then the second
citation would be in accordance with the relevant systems see article input number eight. So
they will do a lot of the work for you. Of course you always have to go over the citations that
the software generates to make sure that it's correct because tinkering is always necessary,
but the software does a lot of the work for you and the advantage of using the software is that
once you finish the text, you can ask the software to generate the bibliography or I did remind
you that you don't have to include a bibliography. But if you do, you and it's not included in the
In any case, both of your coffee takes forever. The software can do that for you in a second by
the way. You can also use Word has a software reference management software, I think, but I
don't think they have the Australian guy who say the one that I know is working with the
Australian vagamon adlc is Mandalay. Now in all courses in the LLM program, I think you will
need to use the aglc so it's a good opportunity for you to practice or getting to get used to the
software and it will save you a lot of time because cross references takes forever. Everyone, do
you have questions about reference management? Nora?
49:41
Yes. Do you know if EndNote has also a aglc citations because that's what the one UNSW
recommends in general, not for legal writing but for Ghana.
49:58
You can google and note aglc Okay, when you use your own Mendeley so I would I don't know.
50:07
Okay, thank you. But
50:09
I'm sure other habit habits that you can do. Okay, other questions? One final point is about
academic integrity. Routine favorites. I included a link to the website of academic integrity at
UNSW on Moodle, review the definition of algorism the instructions relating to academic
integrity I reminded that you submit assignments, software called trying to dig in to these
scans the internet and let me know which sources you worked on. It's extremely sophisticated.
So please be careful in how when you draft your assignment, don't forget to cite it. Sand your
rotation marks and include a citation. Paraphrase if you don't use quotes, paraphrase I know
especially in the beginning, it's really daunting to paraphrase someone who's a leading scholar
in a field for example, but you can do it if you don't do it and it's so what may happen is that
you will have a paper that is only in quotations,
51:39
which is
51:42
a good example of writing or you may run encounter problems in relation to the rules relating
to plagiarism and academic integrity is that everyone visit the website and just sure that you
know why falls under definition of plagiarism and what proper citation practices are
appropriate. appropriate citation practice. Okay, I think I'm done so I uploaded all the resources
to Moodle. I'll also upload this these slides for you to use. Yeah, any questions? I can. You can
use the forum. Laura was brave and was the first to use the assessment is free to use it. I know
any questions before we begin the individual consultations
52:51
great so Yong ki your first um I remind you that access you can access the individual
consultations through Turnitin so if you're scheduled for today, you now build out and the time
comes use this collaborate more every day define it Collaborate session and I will wait for you
already. Okay
53:30
see a four minute zoom here. Are there any questions before I sign off sign? out and log into
the individual consultation room
53:52
Sorry, just sorry. You had a question? No. It was a mistake. tort tort discuss compensation
1:06:40
over the nose. For example, the article used the Danish tort system as an example, which
shows that the degree of tort of loss of limbs and blindness and similar Can I use the can I use
this example? And I use this example and also Hi
1:09:44
1:09:44
Hi, Professor Torres record to this one on one discussion. I have some use. So I I do have some
crash test friends. I do have some close friends close friends first. has a bad word count enough
to boo is it includes two footnotes, footnotes or not. Okay. Do you have do you have a second
and do you have any specific requirements for expressing your do for them to do I have to say
apart view that is different from the article I I know it's not enough to just write what I agree
with the ride. I agree with the article but how should I express a beyond that? In fact, I agree
with my chosen article. What else can I say? Can I use the example from the article or do I
mean ardua had to find a different example for the article. For example, the article uses the
datastore system as an example which shows that the degree of torts of loss of limbs and
blindness or similar can I use this example what what I mean what I what I mean is that I hope
to discuss my thoughts through this example I think the degree of Taurus should be judged
according to the person's current occupation, occupation. For example, if this person is a driver
than bindings is a very serious for him. But if he if the person lost a finger I mean it's not it's not
as bad as blindness for him can contain be writing. Can he can I write write it with this like this?
Do I have to find a article that support my point of view? And the article asked enacted is about
illegal use of legal issue of complaints of compensation. For torts and it mainly discusses legal
compensation for packing compact pecuniary and non peculiar for economy economical for
econ, economic and non Nick knock on economical losses. I will discuss discuss such damages
in conjunction with Chinese Chinese law is barely compensated compensatory, compensatory.
I've been lawyering in China and I. TC plays hate. I really I have. experience that I will use case
but it was just it was freezing by it is Chinese. So I better sue for this is so cute. It's a bit I mean
the soleus was verb I'm here I'm here. crusade perfect chef. coin that is one on one discussion
do hydrotalcite