程序代写案例-COMM1100
时间:2022-07-01
COMM1100 Business Decision MakingEmployee and Supplier Relations DecisionsDr Jimi KimMs Aleksandra (Sasha) BalyanovaGeneral housekeeping:• Please switch your microphone to Mute to avoid disruption to the class• If you need subtitles, turn on live captioning via the More Actions section in Teams• Use Slido to ask questions or make a comment. If you have poor internet, turn off your video• Wait for your lecturer to startJoin at slido.com#129863ⓘ Start presenting to display the joining instructions on this slide.10DecisionMaking inMarketsThe Goals ofBusinessDecisionsCustomerRelationsDecisionsEmployee &SupplierRelationsDecisionsFlexibilityWeekDecisionInteractionswithGovernmentand SocietalGoalsStakeholderDecisionsRegardingManagersComplexity inBusinessDecisionMaking11Introductionto BusinessDecisionMaking11ASSESSMENTSCOMM1100 Business Decision MakingQuiz 1:10%Case studyanalysis: 20%Finalexam 50%Quiz 2:10%2 4 8Decisions Related to Stakeholders10Decision Making Processes5Foundations of Business DecisionsCompetitorRelationsDecisions6 7 931Participation:10% (in total)Participation:10% (in total)Participation:10% (in total)Participation:10% (in total)Participation:10% (in total)Participation:10% (in total)Participation:10% (in total)Participation:10% (in total)• Last week we examined business decisions inrelationship to customers• We learned about:• Price Discrimination• Intellectual Property Law• Customers as Stakeholders• We integrated these sources of knowledge in thecontext of AIDS in AfricaWhat you have learned last weekJoin at slido.com#129863ⓘ Start presenting to display the joining instructions on this slide.What is an employee?ⓘ Start presenting to display the poll results on this slide.Defining an Employee and SupplierEmployee&SupplierA seller of goods or servicesEmployee SupplierTwo distinctcontractual relationshipsEmployee SupplierTwo groups of stakeholders with(sometimes) overlapping interestsMicroeconomics Law Corporate ResponsibilityCase study:UberEats• In December 2020, Uber settled with a former Uber Eats delivery driverin advance of a high-stakes court ruling that would decide whether thedriver was an “employee” or “independent contractor” ("delivery partner")Uber Eats CaseThis Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BYIf you were themanagement of Uber, whatwould you label them as?If you were the management of Uber, whatwould you label them as?ⓘ Start presenting to display the poll results on this slide.The Gig EconomyGig economy – individuals being hired for a specifictask, rather than being employed longer term (with theassociated benefits) for exactly the same task• Workers are exposed to economic risk and uncertainty• Workers lack social welfare structures associated withemployment, e.g. pensions, holiday entitlements andhealthcareManagement of human ‘resources’:an ethical problem between rights and duties• The term ‘human resource management’ and its implicationshave been a subject of intense debate in business ethics• Humans treated as important and costly resource• Consequently, employees are subject to a strict managerialrationale of minimising costs and maximising the efficiency ofthe ‘resource’Rhetoric and realityBased on Legge (1998)Rhetoric Reality‘New working patterns’ Part-time instead of full-time jobs‘Flexibility’ Management can do what it wants‘Empowerment’ Making someone else take the risk and responsibility‘Training and development’ Manipulation‘Recognizing the contribution of theindividual’Undermining the trade union andcollective bargaining‘Teamworking’ Reducing the individual’s discretionEmployee Rights and Employee Duties• Central ethical issues in HRM revolve around rights andduties.• Employee rights:• Entitlements of workers with respect to their employer, based on ageneral understanding of human rights and often codified inemployment law.• Employee duties:• Obligations of workers towards their employer, based on individualcontracts and wider employment laws.Ethical ConsiderationsDeontological Approach:-Rules of behavior: are we treatingthe drivers the way we should betreating them?Utilitarian Approach:- Calculate benefit vs. harm to firm,drivers, restaurants, customersOne relevant economic considerationin this case is Uber’s market powerwith its suppliers.Market power and Uber Eats• If delivery driver labour market isperfectly competitive, then Uber is aprice-taker: can hire however manydrivers it wants at the market wage• If instead Uber is a monopsonist, itis the only employer of deliverydrivers: it chooses how many workand at what wageMarket power1. Is Uber Eats a monopsony?If Uber eats were to class its riders asemployees rather than contractors…2a. Would its riders benefit or be harmed?2b. Would the restaurants it works with benefitor be harmed?2c. Would its consumers benefit or beharmed?Market power and Uber EatsAudience Q&A Sessionⓘ Start presenting to display the audience questions on this slide.• Flex Week! No classes• In Week 7 lecture, we will cover competitor relationsdecisions (and introduce game theory)Next weekReferences• https://www.afr.com/life-and-luxury/food-and-wine/restaurant-anger-directed-at-uber-eats-20200319-p54bxz• https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/dec/30/uber-eats-avoids-landmark-ruling-on-workers-status-by-settling-case-with-delivery-rider• https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/may/18/deliveroo-loses-dismissal-case-after-rider-fired-for-being-too-slow-is-ruled-an-employee• https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/may/17/menulog-pushes-ahead-with-plans-for-drivers-to-become-employees-under-new-award• Interview of Adam Smith with David Card:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF62xDPRK90• Interview of Adam Smith with Guido Imbens:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpCg1J-b8VkThank youIf you have any questions about thecourse, please contact the CourseCoordinator atcomm1100@unsw.edu.auThe lecture recording will be madeavailable in your Moodle course site.© The New YorkerCourse Coordinator: Andreas Ortmann,comm1100@unsw.edu.auCourse site:https://moodle.telt.unsw.edu.au/course/view.php?id=60102