微信客服：xiaoxionga100
微信客服：ITCS521
英文代写-WMGM1002
时间：2022-10-28
WMGM1002 Case Study Marking Rubric
Page 1 of 2
Criteria, Weightings and
Marks
Fail (F)
0 - 4
Pass (P)
5 - 6
Credit (Cr)
7
Distinction (D)
8
High Distinction (HD)
9 - 10
Question 1 (25%)
Which of the five sources of
power outlined in the unit
(Lesson 2.1: Leadership), do
you see reflected in
Ferguson’s approach?
Explain which ones and how
they were exhibited.
Response fails to accurately
identify which five sources of
power are reflected in the leader’s
approach. Explanation of the
reasons is incomplete, irrelevant,
or unclear with no link to theory
and is not supported from the case
study.
Response shows no or limited
understanding of theory.
Response provides a basic
explanation and identification of
relevant sources of power
reflected in the leader’s approach
with some link to theory. Some
support from the case study is
provided.
Response demonstrates some
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear
explanation and identification of
relevant sources of power reflected
in the leader’s approach with some
link to theory. The response is
mostly supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear and
detailed explanation and
identification of relevant sources of
power reflected in the leader’s
approach with some link to theory
and is supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates critical
understanding of theory.
Response provides a consistently
clear, comprehensive, and detailed
explanation and identification of
relevant sources of power reflected
in the leader’s approach. Response
is well linked to theory and is
comprehensively supported from
the case study.
Response demonstrates critical and
analytical understanding of theory.
Question 2 (20%)
Do you think Sir Alex
Ferguson was truly an
autocratic leader when he
was manager of Manchester
United? Explain your answer,
citing evidence from the case
study.
Response fails to determine
whether he is an autocratic leader
or not. The analysis provided is
incomplete, irrelevant, or unclear
with no link to theory and is not
supported from the case study.
Response shows no or limited
understanding of theory.
Response provides a basic
response to the question in
determining his leadership type
with some link to theory. Some
support from the case study is
provided.
Response demonstrates some
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear and
accurate response to the question in
determining his leadership type with
some link to theory. The response is
mostly supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear,
accurate and detailed response to
the question in determining his
leadership type which is linked to
theory and is supported from the
case study.
Response demonstrates critical
understanding of theory.
Response provides a consistently
clear, accurate, comprehensive, and
detailed response to the question in
determining his leadership type.
Response is well linked to theory
and is comprehensively supported
from the case study.
Response demonstrates critical and
analytical understanding of theory.
Question 3 (20%)
Based on the five traits for Sir
Alex Ferguson outlined in the
case study, discuss how his
honesty and integrity would
influence how effective his
communication to players
may be.
Response fails to accurately
discuss the influence of his
honesty and integrity on effective
communication.
Discussion provided is incomplete,
irrelevant, or unclear with no link
to theory and is not supported
from the case study.
Response shows no or limited
understanding of theory.
Response provides a basic
discussion of the influence of his
honesty and integrity on effective
communication with some link to
theory. Some support from the
case study is provided.
Response demonstrates basic
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear and
accurate discussion of the influence
of his honesty and integrity on
effective communication with some
link to theory. The response is
mostly supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates a
reasonable understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear,
accurate and detailed discussion of
the influence of his honesty and
integrity on effective communication
which is linked to theory. The
response is supported from the
case study.
Response demonstrates critical
understanding of theory.
Response provides a consistently
clear, accurate, comprehensive, and
detailed discussion of the influence
of his honesty and integrity on
effective communication. The
response is well linked to theory and
is comprehensively supported from
the case study.
Response demonstrates critical and
analytical understanding of theory.
Question 4 (25%)
As the case study details,
Ferguson has faced several
controversies, including
abusing match officials as
well as his own players. Do
you think this had an impact
on his effectiveness as a
successful leader? Why or
why not?
Response fails to accurately
discuss and analyse the impact of
his behaviour on his leadership’s
effectiveness.
Response provided is incomplete,
irrelevant, or unclear with no link
to theory and is not supported
from the case study.
Response shows no or limited
understanding of theory.
Response provides a basic
discussion and analysis of the
impact of his behaviour on his
leadership’s effectiveness with
some link to theory. Some
support from the case study is
provided.
Response demonstrates some
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear and
accurate discussion and analysis of
the impact of his behaviour on his
leadership’s effectiveness with
some link to theory. The response is
mostly supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear,
accurate and detailed discussion
and analysis of the impact of his
behaviour on his leadership’s
effectiveness which is linked to
theory and is supported from the
case study.
Response demonstrates critical
understanding of theory.
Response provides a consistently
clear, accurate, comprehensive, and
detailed discussion and analysis of
the impact of his behaviour on his
leadership’s effectiveness.
Response is well linked to theory
and is comprehensively supported
from the case study.
Response demonstrates critical and
analytical understanding of theory.
WMGM1002 Case Study Marking Rubric
Page 2 of 2
Criteria, Weightings and
Marks
Fail (F)
0 - 4
Pass (P)
5 - 6
Credit (Cr)
7
Distinction (D)
8
High Distinction (HD)
9 - 10
Academic Writing (5%)
Formal style, hedging,
complex sentence structure, a
broad vocabulary range
Writer’s voice is evident
The writer uses very few academic
writing techniques. Simple
sentences are generally well-
constructed, although complex
sentences lack accuracy or are
not attempted; academic
language/ vocabulary lacks
precision.
The writer uses a number of
academic writing techniques.
Sentences are generally well-
constructed; academic language/
vocabulary is used although
precision may be lacking.
The writer uses a range of
academic writing techniques.
Sentences are generally well-
constructed; academic language/
vocabulary is used with some
precision.
The writer uses a comprehensive
range of academic writing
techniques.
Sentences are well-constructed;
complex academic language/
vocabulary is used with a good
degree of precision.
The writer uses a broad range of
expert academic writing techniques.
The language is skilfully
constructed; sophisticated academic
language/ vocabulary is used with
excellent precision.
Referencing (5%)
Accuracy, consistency, and
compliance with Harvard
style
No referencing or in-text citations
(0 mark) or referencing does not
conform to Harvard style; multiple
inaccuracies and/or
inconsistencies with in-text
references and/or reference list.
Referencing mostly conforms to
Harvard style. May be
inaccuracies and inconsistencies
in the in-text references and/or
reference list.
Referencing conforms to Harvard
style. Few inaccuracies and/or
inconsistencies in the in-text
references and reference list.
Referencing conforms to Harvard
style. Very minor inaccuracies
and/or inconsistencies in the in-text
references and reference list.
Referencing conforms to Harvard
style. The in-text references and a
reference list are faultless, with no
inaccuracies or inconsistencies.
Word Limit Penalty: If the word limit is exceeded by more than 10%, a penalty of minus 5 marks will be applied. (Note: The word limit does not include headings or the reference list.)
Page 1 of 2
Criteria, Weightings and
Marks
Fail (F)
0 - 4
Pass (P)
5 - 6
Credit (Cr)
7
Distinction (D)
8
High Distinction (HD)
9 - 10
Question 1 (25%)
Which of the five sources of
power outlined in the unit
(Lesson 2.1: Leadership), do
you see reflected in
Ferguson’s approach?
Explain which ones and how
they were exhibited.
Response fails to accurately
identify which five sources of
power are reflected in the leader’s
approach. Explanation of the
reasons is incomplete, irrelevant,
or unclear with no link to theory
and is not supported from the case
study.
Response shows no or limited
understanding of theory.
Response provides a basic
explanation and identification of
relevant sources of power
reflected in the leader’s approach
with some link to theory. Some
support from the case study is
provided.
Response demonstrates some
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear
explanation and identification of
relevant sources of power reflected
in the leader’s approach with some
link to theory. The response is
mostly supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear and
detailed explanation and
identification of relevant sources of
power reflected in the leader’s
approach with some link to theory
and is supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates critical
understanding of theory.
Response provides a consistently
clear, comprehensive, and detailed
explanation and identification of
relevant sources of power reflected
in the leader’s approach. Response
is well linked to theory and is
comprehensively supported from
the case study.
Response demonstrates critical and
analytical understanding of theory.
Question 2 (20%)
Do you think Sir Alex
Ferguson was truly an
autocratic leader when he
was manager of Manchester
United? Explain your answer,
citing evidence from the case
study.
Response fails to determine
whether he is an autocratic leader
or not. The analysis provided is
incomplete, irrelevant, or unclear
with no link to theory and is not
supported from the case study.
Response shows no or limited
understanding of theory.
Response provides a basic
response to the question in
determining his leadership type
with some link to theory. Some
support from the case study is
provided.
Response demonstrates some
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear and
accurate response to the question in
determining his leadership type with
some link to theory. The response is
mostly supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear,
accurate and detailed response to
the question in determining his
leadership type which is linked to
theory and is supported from the
case study.
Response demonstrates critical
understanding of theory.
Response provides a consistently
clear, accurate, comprehensive, and
detailed response to the question in
determining his leadership type.
Response is well linked to theory
and is comprehensively supported
from the case study.
Response demonstrates critical and
analytical understanding of theory.
Question 3 (20%)
Based on the five traits for Sir
Alex Ferguson outlined in the
case study, discuss how his
honesty and integrity would
influence how effective his
communication to players
may be.
Response fails to accurately
discuss the influence of his
honesty and integrity on effective
communication.
Discussion provided is incomplete,
irrelevant, or unclear with no link
to theory and is not supported
from the case study.
Response shows no or limited
understanding of theory.
Response provides a basic
discussion of the influence of his
honesty and integrity on effective
communication with some link to
theory. Some support from the
case study is provided.
Response demonstrates basic
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear and
accurate discussion of the influence
of his honesty and integrity on
effective communication with some
link to theory. The response is
mostly supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates a
reasonable understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear,
accurate and detailed discussion of
the influence of his honesty and
integrity on effective communication
which is linked to theory. The
response is supported from the
case study.
Response demonstrates critical
understanding of theory.
Response provides a consistently
clear, accurate, comprehensive, and
detailed discussion of the influence
of his honesty and integrity on
effective communication. The
response is well linked to theory and
is comprehensively supported from
the case study.
Response demonstrates critical and
analytical understanding of theory.
Question 4 (25%)
As the case study details,
Ferguson has faced several
controversies, including
abusing match officials as
well as his own players. Do
you think this had an impact
on his effectiveness as a
successful leader? Why or
why not?
Response fails to accurately
discuss and analyse the impact of
his behaviour on his leadership’s
effectiveness.
Response provided is incomplete,
irrelevant, or unclear with no link
to theory and is not supported
from the case study.
Response shows no or limited
understanding of theory.
Response provides a basic
discussion and analysis of the
impact of his behaviour on his
leadership’s effectiveness with
some link to theory. Some
support from the case study is
provided.
Response demonstrates some
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear and
accurate discussion and analysis of
the impact of his behaviour on his
leadership’s effectiveness with
some link to theory. The response is
mostly supported from the case
study.
Response demonstrates
understanding of theory.
Response provides a clear,
accurate and detailed discussion
and analysis of the impact of his
behaviour on his leadership’s
effectiveness which is linked to
theory and is supported from the
case study.
Response demonstrates critical
understanding of theory.
Response provides a consistently
clear, accurate, comprehensive, and
detailed discussion and analysis of
the impact of his behaviour on his
leadership’s effectiveness.
Response is well linked to theory
and is comprehensively supported
from the case study.
Response demonstrates critical and
analytical understanding of theory.
WMGM1002 Case Study Marking Rubric
Page 2 of 2
Criteria, Weightings and
Marks
Fail (F)
0 - 4
Pass (P)
5 - 6
Credit (Cr)
7
Distinction (D)
8
High Distinction (HD)
9 - 10
Academic Writing (5%)
Formal style, hedging,
complex sentence structure, a
broad vocabulary range
Writer’s voice is evident
The writer uses very few academic
writing techniques. Simple
sentences are generally well-
constructed, although complex
sentences lack accuracy or are
not attempted; academic
language/ vocabulary lacks
precision.
The writer uses a number of
academic writing techniques.
Sentences are generally well-
constructed; academic language/
vocabulary is used although
precision may be lacking.
The writer uses a range of
academic writing techniques.
Sentences are generally well-
constructed; academic language/
vocabulary is used with some
precision.
The writer uses a comprehensive
range of academic writing
techniques.
Sentences are well-constructed;
complex academic language/
vocabulary is used with a good
degree of precision.
The writer uses a broad range of
expert academic writing techniques.
The language is skilfully
constructed; sophisticated academic
language/ vocabulary is used with
excellent precision.
Referencing (5%)
Accuracy, consistency, and
compliance with Harvard
style
No referencing or in-text citations
(0 mark) or referencing does not
conform to Harvard style; multiple
inaccuracies and/or
inconsistencies with in-text
references and/or reference list.
Referencing mostly conforms to
Harvard style. May be
inaccuracies and inconsistencies
in the in-text references and/or
reference list.
Referencing conforms to Harvard
style. Few inaccuracies and/or
inconsistencies in the in-text
references and reference list.
Referencing conforms to Harvard
style. Very minor inaccuracies
and/or inconsistencies in the in-text
references and reference list.
Referencing conforms to Harvard
style. The in-text references and a
reference list are faultless, with no
inaccuracies or inconsistencies.
Word Limit Penalty: If the word limit is exceeded by more than 10%, a penalty of minus 5 marks will be applied. (Note: The word limit does not include headings or the reference list.)
