SBSD 2063 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
SEM 1 2021/2022
CASE STUDY RUBRIC (INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT)
Criterion 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 or below 60
Completeness Complete in all respects;
reflects all requirements
Complete in all respects; reflects
all requirements
Incomplete in many respects;
reflects few requirements
Incomplete in most respects;
does not reflect reflections
Understanding
Demonstrates a sophiscated
understanding of the topic(s)
and issue(s)
Demonstrates
an accomplished understanding
of the topic(s) and issue(s)
Demonstrates an acceptable
understanding of the topic(s)
and issue(s)
Demonstrates an inadequate
understanding of the topic(s)
and issue(s)
Analysis,
evaluation, and
recommendations
Presents an insightful and
thorough analysis of all
issues identified; includes all
necessary financial
calculations
Presents a thorough analysis of
most issues identified; includes
most necessary financial
calculations
Presents a superficial analysis
of some of the issues
identified; omits necessary
financial calculations
Presents an incomplete
analysis of the issues
identified
Makes appropriate and
powerful connections
between the issues identified
and the strategic concepts
studied in the reading;
demonstrates complete
command of the strategic
concepts and analytical tools
studied
Makes appropriate connections
between
the issues identified and the
strategic concepts studied in the
reading; demonstrates good
command of the strategic
concepts and analytical tools
studied
Makes appropriate
but somewhat vague
connections beteween the
issues and concepts studied in
the reading; demonstrates
limited command of the
strategic concepts and
analytical tools studied
Makes little or no conenction
between the issues identified
and the strategic concepts
studied in the reading
Criterion 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 or below 60
Supports diagnosis and
opinions with strong
arguments and evidence;
presents a balanced and
critical view; interpretation is
both reasonable and objective
Suports diagnosis and opinions
with reasons and evidence;
presents
a fairly balanced view;
interpretation is both reasonable
and objective
Supports diagnosis and opinions
with limited reasons and
evidence; presents a somewhat
one- side argument
Supports diagonsis
and opinions with few reasons
and little evience; argument is
one-side and not objective
Presents detailed,
realistic, and appropriate
recommendations clearly
supported by the information
presented and concepts from
the reading
Presents specific, realistics, and
appropriated recommendations
supported by the information
presented and concepts from the
reading
Presents realistic
or appropriate recommendations
supported by the information
presented and concepts from the
reading
Presents realistic
or appropriate
recommendations with little, if
any, support from the
information presented and
concepts from the reading
Research Supplements case study with
relevant and extensive
research into the present
situation of the company,
clearly and thoroughly
documents all sources of
information
Supplements case study with
relevant research into the present
situation of the company;
documents all sources of
information
Supplements case study with
limited research into the present
situation of the company;
provides limited documentation
of sources consulted
Supplements case
study, if at all, with incomplete
research and documentation
Writing mechanics
Writing demonstrates
a sophicated clarity,
conciseness; includes
thorough details and relevant
data and information;
extremely well-organized
Writing is accomplished
in terms of clarity and conciseness
and contains only a few errors;
includes sufficient details and
relevant data and information;
well-organized
Writing lacks clarity
or conciseness and contains
numerous errors; gives
insufficient detail and relevant
data and information; lacks
organization
Writing is unfocused,
rambling, or contains serious
errors; lacks details and
relevant details and
information; poorly organized
Criterion 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 or below 60
APA guidelines Uses APA guidelines
accurately and consistently to
cite sources
Uses APA guidelines with minor
violations to cite sources
Reflects incomplete knowledge
of APA guidelines
Does not use APA guidelines
Source: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System (2019)