MDIA2095-论文代写
时间:2023-04-20
MDIA2095 Assessment Three: Independent Video Research Project
Rubric Categories Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Outstanding
Communication /
Presentation (20%)
The modes of expression and use of
video have not adequately conveyed a
sound understanding of key concepts
from the subject. The form of the
work has not been used to
comprehensively and sufficiently
demonstrate engagement with course
concepts. Further study of the genre
(traditional or non-traditional) is
needed to understand how it works to
shape ideas.
The assessment shows a very
preliminary understanding of how
textual form works to
communicate ideas, and there are
significant issues with the clarity
and precision of the project. The
work is struggling to make some of
the emerging ideas clear, and as a
consequence it is challenging to
read/view. There are some efforts
to convey meaning through the
genre (traditional or non-
traditional).
The work shows a promising and
developing use of the genre to convey
meaning. You have demonstrated
efforts to make use of form
(traditional or non-traditional) to
communicate your ideas in relation to
course concepts. There remain
untapped opportunities to delve
further into the potentials of the form
to express and unpack your unique
approach to concepts.
The assessment shows critically and
creatively informed use of genre
(traditional or non-traditional). Ideas are
beginning to emerge in an interesting and
evocative way, although there is still
room to consider the ways in which the
form of the work could engage and shape
further nuances from theories and ideas.
There are still some aspects of the work
that are a little untidy and not quite
polished.
The work makes excellent use of genre
to expressively and creatively convey
concepts. You have excelled at using the
traditional or non-traditional form to
effectively shape and articulate your
unique approach to course concepts.
Conceptual
Understanding (20%)
The project shows a very weak and
underdeveloped understanding of key
concepts. Engagement with scholarly
theories is minimal to none, and not
enough time has been given to
developing conceptual links in an
informed and well-researched way.
The project shows an adequate but
rudimentary level of conceptual
understanding. You make a good
effort to demonstrate awareness
of academic concepts, although
more research time is needed to
demonstrate a nuanced grasp of
the ideas that are beginning to
emerge.
The project demonstrates a solid
grasp of the key theories and
conceptual connections are emerging.
However, there is still room to
develop a more sophisticated
understanding of how the ideas from
the subject can be used in very
specific ways, and there is untapped
potential in the critical and creative
uses of these ideas.
The project shows a very good handle on
the concepts and how they can be
critically and creatively deployed. Some
original insights into theories from the
subject are emerging in the conceptual
links you are making, and in the ways you
use the genre to convey your critical
understanding. That said, there are a few
areas where a more nuanced and
detailed conceptual understanding could
be profitably developed.
This project shows an excellent level of
conceptual understanding, as you have
used a unique critical and creative
approach to make links between key
ideas from the subject. The nuance of
your understanding is conveyed through
focused and insightful integration of
theory with a) the practice of your
creative work; b) the traditional essay’s
insights on real-world implications.
Structure /
Coherence (20%)
There is no evident cohesion to the
structure of your work (traditional or
non-traditional). Connections between
concepts are disjointed, and the genre
hasn’t been used to shape meaning in
a comprehensive way. The intentions
behind the work are unable to be
effectively realised through video –
more time is needed on information
layout/ compositional strategies.
There is satisfactory structure to
the project although more work is
needed to lend cohesive strength
to the connections between ideas.
The genre / composition has
potential to be used in a way that
guides the reader’s experience
more steadily, so that the
intentions of the work can emerge
with greater focus and clarity.
There is a solid structure to the
project, as the intentions behind the
work are emerging well and
conceptual links are realized in the use
of the genre. That said, there is
potential to hone and develop the
details of the structure, through a)
careful pacing/unpacking of the ideas
in writing, and/or b) via more
attention to compositional staging of a
creative project.
This is a very well structured and
cohesively arranged project. The work
follows a thoughtfully composed form
that effectively shapes the meaning and
conceptual nuance of the work. The
genre has been used to create a well-
rounded and engaging work, although in
one or two places there are elements
waiting to be further integrated into the
overall shape of the project.
Beautifully structured work. This project
shows you have put time and energy into
carefully unpacking and arranging the
information/composition through well-
planned use of genre and form. There is
structural integrity in the connections
formed between concepts, and in the
ways you guide the reader through the
stages of your critical / creative
approach.
Research (20%)
This project does not manage to
demonstrate an effective engagement
with relevant research material. There
is an extremely superficial
engagement with the course readings,
and the work doesn’t demonstrate
your own unique approach to
This project shows an adequate but
nevertheless basic level of
engagement with relevant research
material and course readings.
Stronger and more productive
engagement is needed in order to
develop a unique way of using
There is productive use of scholarly
ideas from the course materials, and
you show that your approach to
theory is informed by good critical
reading. However, there is room to
spend more time delving into the key
concepts by developing additional
There is clearly a strong level of
engagement with subject resources in
your project, and you have begun to
develop your appreciation of key
concepts through additional research.
Productive and reflective research is
evident, although there are one or two
This project shows excellent care has
gone into thoroughly understanding the
key concepts. An attentive reading
process is shown through your critical
exploration of ideas and their
relationship to one another. The nuances
and possibilities of using these concepts
scholarly concepts that have been
studied. It is important to make use of
a sufficient number of resources from
our online material, and to show
active study that has resulted from
engaging with lectures/tutes.
theories from the course. More
time is needed towards a reflective
reading/study process.
research and/ or investigating how
these scholarly concepts work in
relation to one another.
areas where use of resources could be
refined - further study of how these ideas
inform/challenge one another is also
possible.
are emerging clearly, and it’s evident you
have done substantial additional reading
to achieve this.
Referencing (20%)
There is consistently poor referencing
in this project, both in-text as well as
with your Reference List. You are
advised to refer to the Reference Style
Guide (on Moodle), as correct
referencing is an important aspect of
academic integrity.
There are a few too many instances
of untidy and/or incorrect
referencing in your project – this
needs to be addressed.
Referencing is generally up to
standard – however, there are still a
few instances of untidy referencing
and/or incorrect adherence to proper
referencing conventions.
Referencing is generally very good –
however, there are a few untidy (but
minor) mistakes that could have been
picked up.
Well done – referencing is pristine.
essay、essay代写