MIS501_Assessment _3_Brief_Business Case Study Final Solution_ Module Due_6.1
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS501 Principles of Programming
Assessment Business Case Study: Final Solution
Individual/Group Group
Length • 2000 words (+/- 10%) or equivalent including source code and
comments,
• 1 UML diagram
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of
the task below include:
a) Synthesise the tenets of procedural programming into the object-
oriented paradigm.
b) Design and implement solutions using unified modelling language
(UML) diagrams and coding to meet business needs.
c) Apply an integrated development environment (IDE) using project
management principles to create, compile, test and run codes to
address business problems.
d) Employ object-oriented concepts to solve business problems and
justify decisions.
Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1.
Weighting 45%
Total Marks 100 marks
Task Summary
In groups, develop a Python program using the object-orientated program paradigm. Please refer to the Task
Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
Object Orientated Programming (OOP) is one of the most popular programming paradigms. In contrast with
procedural programming, OOP uses reusable classes as the building blocks, which are used to create individual
instances of objects. OOP developers focus on the interactions and relationships between objects. In this
subject, we introduced you to some core concepts of OOP, including classes, objects, instances, encapsulation and
inheritance. In this assessment, you will put them together to develop a program using the OOP paradigm, through
which you will demonstrate the following knowledge and skills:
• Collaborate with other developers and using OOP to develop a program in parallel.
• OOP design and implementation.
• Understanding the concepts of classes and inheritance.
• Design a program and illustrate the relations and associations through UML Diagram.
Instructions
1. Form groups of 2 – 3 students. Please read attached MIS501_Assessment 2 & 3_Group Formation,
Registration and Administration Guidelines document.
2. Please read the attached MIS501_Assessment 3_Business Case Study and complete the assessment tasks.
3. All implementations must be in Python 3 (that is NOT Python 2). Programs implemented in a different language
will be marked 0. Programs implemented in Python 2 will be capped at 50% of the available marks.
MIS501_Assessment _3_Brief_Business Case Study Final Solution_ Module Due_6.1
4. You may only use the language features and syntax taught in Module 1.1 through to Module 6.1. You MUST
not use any other language features beyond what was taught by Module 6.1. Penalties apply.
5. You may implement the programs in any IDE of your choice.
6. The program should be provided with adequate and meaning comments.
7. The program must be implemented using OOP. Programs implemented without any OOP will be capped at
30% of the available marks.
8. Your program should be robust. Check for input validity.
Hint
What would you do if user chose option 3 without entering any student information first?
9. Please follow Python Style Guide: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
Hint
Think about what classes you will need to implement, and which should inherit which. You should not assume
that the user will choose the menu options in a sequential order, that is, the user may choose Option 1, enter
some user information, then choose 2 >> 2.1 to print them, then back to Option 1 in the main menu to entre
more user information.
10. You are strongly advised to read the rubric which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the
assignment. This will give them a clear picture of what a successful final solution looks like.
11. Peer evaluation
a) Group participation will constitute the final 10% of the mark for Assessment 3. Participation will be
determined as follows:
b) Each student in the team will evaluate the other members’ contributions using a participation score matrix
(see Group Participation Score Matrix attached)
c) Individually, each team member will assign a “Group participation score” (from 1-5) for each member of
the group using the score matrix.
d) Each student is to assess peers’ contributions according to the Peer Evaluation Grading Scheme.
e) The participation score matrix submitted by each individual student via the Assessment 3 link at the same
time after the Group submission.
f) The Facilitator will use the average “group participation score” for each member to determine the
weighted ‘Teamwork’ criterion row in the final marking rubric for this assessment.
g) All peer evaluation submissions are confidential not viewed by the other team members.
Submission Instructions
Graded submission- Group submission
Submit this task via the Assessment 3 link in the main navigation menu in MIS501 Principles of
Programming. You should submit one or multiple Python file(s) (ending .py). The Learning Facilitator will provide
feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Submit the following 2 files for this assessment in MIS501: Principles of Programming.
a) Task 1 Flow Chart Diagram - task1.docx/jpeg/pdf.
b) Python Program, demonstrating the implication of tasks 1,2 & 3 - Solution.py
DO NOT zip these files into one file, submit individual files. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback
via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Peer Evaluation – Individual Submission
Each individual student is to submit a completed team participation score matrix document in the Assessment 3 –
Peer Evaluation submission link. Please submit a peer review correctly, as no submission may result is zero
grading for this assessment criteria.
MIS501_Assessment _3_Brief_Business Case Study Final Solution_ Module Due_6.1
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information
on referencing here https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool
Academic Integrity Declaration
We declare that except where we have referenced, the work we are submitting for this assessment task
is our own work. We have read and are aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy
and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
We are aware that we need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and we will do so
accordingly.
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately
referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to
have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and
subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.
(http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms)
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or
extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework
and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment
Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.
MIS501_Assessment _3_Brief_Business Case Study Final Solution_ Module Due_6.1
Assessment Rubric
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve minimum
standard)
0-49%
Pass (Functional)
50-64%
Credit (Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction (Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Object Oriented
Programming
Percentage for this
criterion = 30%
The program is not
implemented with the
Object-Oriented
Programming paradigm.
No implementations of
classes.
The program demonstrates
basic understanding of
Object-Oriented
Programming.
There are classes with
instance variables and
methods implemented.
The design of classes has
much room for
improvement.
Does not implement
inheritance between
classes.
The program
demonstrates proficient
understanding of Object-
Oriented Programming.
The design of classes is
generally sound, including
their instance/class
variables and methods.
Inheritance between
classes implemented.
There is some room for
improvement in the
implementation of the
inheritance relationship
between classes.
The program demonstrates
advanced understanding of
Object-Oriented
Programming.
The design of classes is
sound, including their
instance/class variables and
methods.
Inheritance between classes
implemented.
The inheritance relationship
is reasonable and correctly
implemented.
The program
demonstrates exceptional
understanding of OOP
through the design of
classes.
Classes including their
initiation, instance/class
variables and methods are
expertly designed and
implemented.
The inheritance
relationship between
classes is sound and
expertly implemented.
UML Diagram
Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
The Diagram is
completely unrelated to
Assignment tasks.
The diagram is relevant to
Assignment tasks but does not
use conventional notations
or the flow is not logically
sound.
The actors, relationships and
associations as depicted in
the diagram may not be
consistent with that in the
program.
The diagram is relevant to
Assignment tasks, largely
follows the conventional
notations and the flow is
largely correct.
The actors, relationships and
associations as depicted in
the diagram is largely
consistent with that in the
program.
The diagram is relevant to
Assignment tasks, follows the
conventional notations, and
the flow is complete and
correct.
The actors, relationships and
associations as depicted in the
diagram is consistent with
that in the program.
The diagram is relevant to
Assignment tasks, follows
the conventional notations,
and the flow is complete
and correct.
The actors, relationships and
associations as depicted in
the diagram is consistent
with that in the program.
Not missing any actors,
associations, and
relationships.
MIS501_Assessment _3_Brief_Business Case Study Final Solution_ Module Due_6.1
Task 1
Sign up and Sign in
Percentage for this
criterion = 20%
The program is not
implemented in Python3.
Does not run and contain
syntax errors. Completely
unrelated to the Task 1
requirements.
No Python script file (.py)
is submitted (e.g.,
submission of a .txt or .doc
file)
The program demonstrates a
working understanding of
Python programming.
Implemented in Python 3
and runs. Does not contain
any syntax errors. Generally,
satisfies major functional
requirements in Task 1.
Contains some logical errors.
Does not conform to Python
programming style guide.
The program demonstrates
proficient skills in Python
programming.
Implemented in Python 3
and runs. Does not contain
any syntax errors.
Satisfies almost all
functional requirements in
Task 1, but few minor
functional requirements in
Task 1 may not have been
implemented.
In general, the program is
logically sound but may
contain very minor logical
errors.
Conforms to Python
programming style guide.
The program demonstrates
advanced skills in Python
programming. Implemented in
Python 3 and runs.
Does not contain any syntax
errors. All functional
requirements in Task 1 are
implemented.
Logically sound and does not
contain any logical errors.
Strictly conforms to Python
programming style guide.
The program demonstrates
exceptional Python
programming skills.
Expertly designed and is
robust, concise, and
efficient. Demonstrates
advanced skills in Python
programming.
Implemented in Python 3
and runs. Does not contain
any syntax errors. All
functional requirements in
Task 1 are implemented.
Logically sound and does
not contain any logical
errors. Strictly conforms to
Python programming style
guide.
MIS501_Assessment _3_Brief_Business Case Study Final Solution_ Module Due_6.1
Task 2
Ordering
Percentage for this
criterion = 20%
The program is not
implemented in Python 3.
Does not run and contain
syntax errors.
Completely unrelated to
the Task 2 requirements.
No Python script file (.py)
is submitted (e.g.,
submission of a .txt or
.doc file)
The program demonstrates a
working understanding of
Python programming.
Implemented in Python 3
and runs.
Does not contain any syntax
errors.
Generally, satisfies major
functional requirements in
Task 2.
Contain some logical errors.
May not conform to Python
programming style guide.
The program demonstrates
proficient skills in Python
programming.
Implemented in Python 3
and runs. Does not contain
any syntax errors.
Satisfies almost all
functional requirements in
Task 2, but few minor
functional requirements in
Task 2 may not have been
implemented.
Logically sound but may
contain very minor logical
errors.
Largely conforms to
Python programming style
guide.
The program demonstrates
advanced skills in Python
programming.
Implemented in Python 3 and
runs.
Does not contain any syntax
errors.
All functional requirements
in Task 2.
Logically sound and does not
contain any logical errors.
Strictly conforms to Python
programming style guide.
The program demonstrates
exceptional Python
programming skills.
Expertly designed and is
robust, concise, and
efficient. Demonstrates
advanced skills in Python
programming.
Implemented in Python 3
and runs. Does not contain
any syntax errors.
All functional requirements
in Task 2 are implemented
Logically sound and does
not contain any logical
errors. Strictly conforms to
Python programming style
guide.
MIS501_Assessment _3_Brief_Business Case Study Final Solution_ Module Due_6.1
Task 3
Summary of
Transactions
Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
The program is not
implemented in Python3.
Does not run and contain
syntax errors.
Completely unrelated to the
Task 3 requirements.
No Python script file (.py) is
submitted (e.g., submission
of a .txt or .doc file). The
program used the “set”
structure.
The program demonstrates a
working understanding of
Python programming.
Implemented in Python 3 and
runs.
Does not contain any syntax
errors.
Satisfies major functional
requirements in Task 3.
Contain some logical errors. Does
not conform to Python
programming style guide
The program demonstrates
proficient skills in Python
programming.
Implemented in Python 3 and
runs. Does not contain any
syntax errors. Satisfies
almost all functional
requirements in Task 3, but
few minor functional
requirements in Task 3 may
not have been implemented.
Logically sound but may
contain very minor logical
errors.
Conforms to Python
programming style guide.
The program demonstrates
advanced skills in Python
programming.
Implemented in Python 3 and
runs.
Does not contain any syntax
errors.
All functional requirements in
Task 3 are implemented.
Logically sound and does not
contain any logical errors.
Strictly conforms to Python
programming style guide.
The program demonstrates
exceptional Python
programming skills.
Expertly designed and is
robust, concise, and efficient.
Demonstrates advanced
skills in Python
programming. Implemented in
Python 3 and runs. Does not
contain any syntax errors. All
functional requirements in
Task 3 are implemented.
Logically sound and does not
contain any logical errors
Strictly conforms to Python
programming style guide.
Teamwork
Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
Does not participate
effectively in a team
environment.
Places individual goals
ahead of the group
responsibility.
Hinders the group process
and upsets the schedule.
Participates effectively in teams.
Identifies team and individual
goals, tasks, responsibilities,
and schedules.
Contributes to group processes.
Supports the team.
Contributes to small group
discussions to reach
agreement on issues.
Works together with others
towards shared goals.
Renegotiates responsibilities
to meet needed change.
Understands group dynamics
and team roles. Facilitates
team development.
Renegotiates responsibilities,
tasks, and schedules to meet
needed change.
Builds team’s identity and
commitment. Leads teams.
Evaluates teams’ outcomes.
Implements strategies for
enhancing team
effectiveness.