School of Population Health UNSW Medicine and Health PHCM1002: Introduction to Public Health Assessment 3: Final Report Length: 2000 words Due date: 1st May 2023 by 4pm (Sydney AEST) Weighting: 40% Task description: For this assessment task, you must consider the role that social and economic, ethnicity and culture, environmental, and political and behavioural factors play on a public health problem. Below we have provided potential topics you may consider for this assessment. However, you may also choose your own topic. If you’d like to reach out to confirm your additional topic, please feel free to do so. Example topics: • Tobacco use and smoking behaviours in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders • Obesity in Australia’s paediatric population • Cancer in ethnic minorities (you may choose a specific group and cancer type if you wish) Your report should include: • A clear description of the selected health problem, including an outline of the significance of the problem and a description of the trends in the epidemiology of the health problem. To support this, it is recommended that you focus on a particular country, region, or population group. You may choose from the topics provided, however, you may also choose your own topic. Describe the health problem or issue using published peer-reviewed literature. • A review of the risk factors that impact the burden of the public health problem using the determinants of health lens, including the social and economic environment, the physical determinants and the person’s characteristics and behaviours. • Details about a public health activity (i.e. health legislation, health policy, health education/promotion, healthy settings or reorienting health systems) that has been used or is currently being used to address the health problem or a strategy that to address the health problem Feedback: Feedback will be provided 2 weeks after the due date School of Population Health UNSW Medicine and Health Instructions for Assessment 3: Final report Section (‘week’ refer to the Term week for this topic) Instruction Indicative word count Marks 1. Introduction (Burden of disease & Epidemiology) • Provide an introduction that frames the topic of your choice • Describe the selected health problem and its significance • Provide a description of the epidemiologic burden/trends of the selected health problem within your selected country, region, or population using varied literature resources (peer-review, government reports etc.) 500 8 2. Determinants of health (Social determinants of health & risk factors) • Outline social determinants of health that might be associated with the selected health issue from the country, region, or population your report is focused on. • Review and detail associated risk factors that contribute to the burden of impact • Use social, economic, environmental, and physical determinant lenses through which to review your selected health issue. 500 10 3. Public health strategies (public health efforts & activities to address the health challenge) • Identify and explain at least two public health activities (strategies, existing programs, planned programs) that aim to address your selected public health issue. • Discuss the appropriateness of the activities taking into account the determinants of health you identified. • Discuss (if available) how these activities are tracking. Are there insights to this? When might be expect to see results? What will be markers of these results? (if activities are yet to be completed, focus on what markers of success will be). 700 12 4. Conclusion • Summarise your report by providing some wrap-up thoughts on the issue, your assessment of the public health activities and your recommendations on what future public health activities should focus on to lessen the burden of impact of your selected health issue. 300 5 5. References • Use Vancouver style or APA 7th for in text citations and a reference list (highly recommended to use EndNote) Not included in word count 5 6. Additional criteria: quality of presentation and academic writing • Use clear, coherent, and grammatically correct academic writing • Present the report in a professional layout, minimum 1.5 line spacing and 11 pt. font • Use headings (and sub-headings where appropriate) to clearly distinguish between all sections • Use bullet points minimally, and only where appropriate (i.e. for short lists) • Adhere to word count 7. Total 2000 40 School of Population Health UNSW Medicine and Health Rubric for Assessment 3: Final report Section/criteria HD (<85%) Distinction (75-84%) Credit (65-74%) Pass (50-64%) Fail (<50%) Introduction (Burden of disease & Epidemiology) ~500 words Provided a comprehensive summary, with a high level of clarity, coherence and succinctness, of: • The selected health issue and its significance topic of your choice • Description of the epidemiologic burden/trends of the selected health problem within the selected country, region, or population using varied literature resources (peer-review, government reports etc.) Provided a good summary, with a high level of clarity, coherence and succinctness, of: • The selected health issue and its significance topic of your choice • Description of the epidemiologic burden/trends of the selected health problem within the selected country, region, or population using varied literature resources (peer-review, government reports etc.) Summary lacked some thorough critical appraisal of burden of disease and varied data sources. Provided a summary of: • The selected health issue and its significance topic of your choice • Description of the epidemiologic burden/trends of the selected health problem within the selected country, region, or population using varied literature resources (peer-review, government reports etc.) Summary lacked some thorough critical appraisal of burden of disease and varied data sources. The introduction is provided, but greater clarity, coherence and succinctness is required. Limited or no introduction is provided. School of Population Health UNSW Medicine and Health Section/criteria HD (<85%) Distinction (75-84%) Credit (65-74%) Pass (50-64%) Fail (<50%) Determinants of health (Social determinants of health & risk factors) ~500 words With reference to the selected health issue, the report comprehensively explained all of the following: • Social determinants of health that might be associated with the selected health issue from the country, region, or population your report is focused on. • Detailed associated risk factors that contribute to the burden of impact of the selected health issue • Use of social, economic, environmental, and physical determinants lens through which to review your selected health issue. With reference to the selected health issue, the report explained the majority of the following: • Social determinants of health that might be associated with the selected health issue from the country, region, or population your report is focused on. • Detailed associated risk factors that contribute to the burden of impact of the selected health issue Use of social, economic, environmental, and physical determinants lens through which to review your selected health issue. With reference to the selected health issue, the report explained some all of the following: • Social determinants of health that might be associated with the selected health issue from the country, region, or population your report is focused on. • Detailed associated risk factors that contribute to the burden of impact of the selected health issue Use of social, economic, environmental, and physical determinants lens through which to review your selected health issue. The discussion is provided, but greater clarity, coherence and succinctness is required. Some explanation is provided for all of the following: • Social determinants of health that might be associated with the selected health issue from the country, region, or population your report is focused on. • Detailed associated risk factors that contribute to the burden of impact of the selected health issue • Use of social, economic, environmental, and physical determinants lens through which to review your selected health issue. The discussion is missing, limited, vague or tenuously related to the selected health issue. Some or all the following has not been correctly identified in the discussion: • Social determinants of health that might be associated with the selected health issue from the country, region, or population your report is focused on. • Detailed associated risk factors that contribute to the burden of impact of the selected health issue • Use of social, economic, environmental, School of Population Health UNSW Medicine and Health Section/criteria HD (<85%) Distinction (75-84%) Credit (65-74%) Pass (50-64%) Fail (<50%) and physical determinants lens through which to review your selected health issue. Public health strategies (public health efforts & activities to address the health challenge) ~700 words Informed by a broad range of credible sources (academic literature/evidence), the detailed public health strategies includes all of the following: • Identify and explain at least two public health activities (strategies, existing programs, planned programs) that aim to address your selected public health issue. • Discuss the appropriateness of the activities taking into account the determinants of health you identified. • Discuss (if available) how these activities are tracking. Are there insights to this? When might be expect to see Informed by a broad range of credible sources (academic literature/evidence), the detailed public health strategies includes the majority of the following: • Identify and explain at least two public health activities (strategies, existing programs, planned programs) that aim to address your selected public health issue. • Discuss the appropriateness of the activities taking into account the determinants of health you identified. • Discuss (if available) how these activities are tracking. Are there Informed by a broad range of credible sources (academic literature/evidence), the detailed public health strategies includes some of the following: • Identify and explain at least two public health activities (strategies, existing programs, planned programs) that aim to address your selected public health issue. • Discuss the appropriateness of the activities taking into account the determinants of health you identified. • Discuss (if available) how these activities are tracking. Are there The discussion is provided, but greater clarity, coherence and succinctness is required. Minimal credible sources were provided to support the rationale. Some explanation is provided for all of the following: • Identify and explain at least two public health activities (strategies, existing programs, planned programs) that aim to address your selected public health issue. • Discuss the appropriateness of the activities taking into account the determinants of health you identified. • Discuss (if available) how these activities are tracking. Are there Several aspects of the following were present: • Not all required criteria (as indicated in the ‘HD’ column) were addressed in the rationale, or were addressed in insufficient depth, or explanations were illogical. • Insufficient or irrelevant credible sources were provided to support the proposal. School of Population Health UNSW Medicine and Health Section/criteria HD (<85%) Distinction (75-84%) Credit (65-74%) Pass (50-64%) Fail (<50%) results? What will be markers of these results? (if activities are yet to be completed, focus on what markers of success will be). insights to this? When might be expect to see results? What will be markers of these results? (if activities are yet to be completed, focus on what markers of success will be). insights to this? When might be expect to see results? What will be markers of these results? (if activities are yet to be completed, focus on what markers of success will be). insights to this? When might be expect to see results? What will be markers of these results? (if activities are yet to be completed, focus on what markers of success will be). Conclusion (~ 300 words) A concise summary of the report is provided with concluding statements on the selected health issue and future recommendations. A good summary of the report is provided with concluding statements on the selected health issue and but may lack critical analysis or future recommendations. A summary of the report is provided but may lack concluding statements on the selected health issue and future recommendations. A summary of the selected health issue is provided with surface level thoughts of recommendations for future. Greater clarity, coherence and succinctness is required. A summary of the selected health issue is not provided, or is not clear, or is illogical. References Vancouver or APA 7th referencing style is used correctly and consistently throughout. Vancouver or APA 7th referencing style is used consistently throughout but may include some errors. Vancouver or APA 7th referencing style is used throughout, with errors. Articles sourced may not be ad varied. Vancouver or APA 7th referencing style is used, but more attention is needed as many errors are present. Vancouver or APA 7th referencing style is not used, or is not used correctly or consistently throughout. Quality of report and academic writing • Clear, coherent, succinct and grammatically correct academic writing is used. The structure is logical, and transitions between paragraphs/sections is logical. • Writing is coherent and clear with few grammatical errors. The structure is logical, and transitions between paragraphs/sections is logical. • Writing is coherent with some grammatical errors. The structure is logical, and transitions between paragraphs/sections is logical in most places. • The writing expression has numerous grammatical errors and needs improvement in clarity, coherence, clarity and/or succinctness. The writing expression has numerous grammatical or spelling errors and needs improvement to be clear, coherent and succinct. School of Population Health UNSW Medicine and Health Section/criteria HD (<85%) Distinction (75-84%) Credit (65-74%) Pass (50-64%) Fail (<50%) • The report is presented in a professional layout, with appropriate use of headings, minimal use of bullet points, minimum 1.5 line spacing and 11 pt. font. • Word count has been adhered to. • The report is presented in a good layout, with appropriate use of headings, minimal use of bullet points, minimum 1.5 line spacing and 11 pt. font. • Word count has been adhered to. • The report is presented in a good layout, with the majority of appropriate use of headings, minimal use of bullet points, minimum 1.5 line spacing and 11 pt. font. • Word count may not have been adhered to • The structure and/or transitions between paragraphs/sections is need improvement. • Formatting or word count has not been adhered to. The report is poorly formatted. Word count has not been adhered to.
学霸联盟