MGTS1601 Course Reflection Marking Rubric
Below Expectations Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding
Criterion 1: Introduction
(10%)
You have not provided a satisfactory Introduction,
with most or all elements missing or unclear.
Overall, you have failed to address the major
requirements of this criterion.
You have provided an adequate Introduction however some
elements may be missing or need further elaboration.
You have provided a very good explanation of the
importance of self-awareness in personal and work settings,
drawing on relevant scholarly literature. You have stated the
aim of the reflection. You have provided a very good
description of the structure of your reflection.
You have provided a very clear and convincing explanation of
the importance of self-awareness in personal and work
settings, drawing on relevant scholarly literature. You have
clearly stated the aim of the reflection. You have provided an
entirely appropriate description of the structure of your
reflection.
Criterion 2: Reflection
on Personality and
Teamwork (20%)
You have not provided a satisfactory discussion of
your scores on the Big Five Personality Inventory, or
your scores/discussion are missing. There is little to
no attempt to discuss the implications of your
personality for your behaviour in your workshop
team, or the implications are unclear. There is little
to no attempt to integrate relevant sources from
the peer reviewed literature. Overall, you have
failed to address the major requirements of this
criterion.
You have presented and described your scores on the Big
Five Personality Inventory. You have made some attempt to
discuss the implications of your three strongest traits for
your behaviour in your workshop team. The discussion is
supported by some sources from the peer-reviewed
literature, although this is limited in places. Overall, the
discussion is satisfactory but requires further elaboration,
critical thinking, evidence and/or examples.
You have presented and described your scores on the Big
Five Personality Inventory clearly and comprehensively. You
have discussed the implications of your three strongest traits
for your behaviour in your workshop team, supported by
evidence and/or examples. The discussion is supported by
relevant sources from the peer-reviewed literature. Overall,
this discussion is very good with minor areas for
improvement.
You have presented and described your scores on the Big
Five Personality Inventory clearly and comprehensively. You
have discussed the implications of your three strongest traits
for your behaviour in your workshop team, supported by
highly relevant evidence and/or examples. You have
demonstrated exceptional critical thinking in discussing the
influence of your personality on your behaviour in your team.
The discussion is supported by highly relevant sources from
the peer-reviewed literature.
Criterion 3: Reflection
on Simulation
Experience (20%)
You did not provide a satisfactory reflection about
yourself and your simulation experience, with most
elements missing or unclear. Overall, you have failed
to address the major requirements of this criterion.
You have provided a satisfactory reflection about yourself
and your simulation experience, although some elements are
missing or need more elaboration. Overall, you have
addressed most elements of this criterion to a satisfactory
standard.
You have provided a mostly comprehensive reflection about
yourself. You have provided a very good discussion of what
you learnt about yourself from completing the simulation
although there is scope for improvement. Your discussion is
supported by some relevant examples. A few minor elements
are missing/unclear but the reflection is very good overall.
You have provided a very comprehensive and insightful
reflection about yourself, including your personal values and
purpose. You have provided an exceptionally clear and
cohesive discussion of what you learnt about yourself from
completing the simulation. Here, you have clearly and
thoughtfully explained how your motivations/priorities are
likely to affect your choices in future, including any trade-offs
you are likely to make. Your discussion is supported by highly
relevant examples. You have clearly stated two points that
you learnt about others from discussing the simulation in
class.
Criterion 4: Reflection
on Employability Skills
(30%)
Overall, you did not adequately compare and contrast
your current skills with 21st century employability
skills, or the discussion is missing. You did not identify
appropriately how you could further develop your skills.
The reflection lacks adequate support from the peer-
reviewed literature. Overall, you have failed to address
the major requirements of this criterion.
You were able to provide an adequate reflection on your
current skills and how these compare to 21st century
employability skills, although your discussion is limited in
places. There is some discussion of how you could improve
your skills. The discussion is supported by some sources from
the peer-reviewed literature. Overall, the discussion is
satisfactory but requires further elaboration, evidence
and/or examples.
You were able to compare and contrast your current skills
with four 21st century employability skills, using relevant
peer-reviewed sources to support your points. Your skill
evaluation was based on evidence and/or examples. Based on
this analysis, you were able to persuasively identify how you
could further develop the skill(s) that need improvement
based on recommendations from appropriate peer-reviewed
sources.
You were able to cleverly compare and contrast your current
skills with four 21st century employability skills, using highly
relevant peer-reviewed sources to support your points. Your
skill evaluation was based on clear evidence and/or examples.
Based on this analysis, you were able to critically and logically
identify how you could further develop the skill(s) that need
improvement based on recommendations from highly
appropriate peer-reviewed sources.
Criterion 5: Conclusion (5%) Overall, your Conclusion is unsatisfactory, with major
points not summarised clearly and/or concisely, or it
is missing.
Your Conclusion is generally clear and concise. You have
summarised most of the major points in your reflection but
some are missing.
Your conclusion is clear and concise. You have
summarised the major points in your reflection.
Your conclusion is exceptionally clear and concise. You
have appropriately summarised the major points in your
reflection
Criterion 6: Writing (10%) Your reflection is poorly structured, planned and/or
sequenced. Your writing is highly disjointed with poor
sentence structure. Your tone is not professional.
There are numerous spelling punctuation
and grammatical errors, which makes your
writing confusing and difficult for the reader
to follow.
The structure of your reflection shows some evidence of
planning and sequencing abilities. A generally appropriate
tone is used, though there are some disruptions to the
fluency of your writing. You made a sound attempt to
correctly use punctuation, grammar and spelling, with
minor errors and the occasional major error.
The structure of your reflection shows strong planning and
sequencing abilities. Your writing is mostly fluent and the
reflection is written in an appropriate professional tone.
Mostly correct punctuation, grammar and spelling are used
throughout, with only the occasional minor error.
The structure of your reflection shows very strong
planning and sequencing abilities. Your writing is
exceptionally fluent and the reflection is written in an
appropriate professional tone. Correct use of
punctuation, grammar and spelling enhances the
readability of your reflection.
Criterion 7:
Presentation (5%)
Overall, the reflection is poorly presented and lacks
professional insight. There are multiple, consistent
errors in the in-text citations and/or Reference List,
and the reflection is substantially over or under the
required word limit. The reflection did not
incorporate the required title page.
Though not entirely professional in its look, the reflection is
presented with the required title page, page numbering,
double-spacing and margins. A single referencing style is
generally used throughout. Though there are some errors in
the in-text citations and/or Reference List, the reflection is
within the required word limit (+/-10%).
Your reflection is professionally presented with the required
title page, page numbering, double-spacing and appropriate
margins. A single referencing style is consistently used, with
very few errors to be found in the in-text citations and/or
Reference List. The reflection is within the required word
limit (+/-10%).
The professional presentation of your reflection is flawless
complemented by the required title page, page numbering,
double-spacing and appropriate margins. A single
referencing style is consistently used throughout, with no
errors in the in-text citations and/or Reference List. The
reflection is within the required word limit (+/-10%).
** Students must have attended the Week 12 and 13 tutorials and participated in activities (or received an exemption from course staff ) to receive more than 9/20