TIMS7317 Project Report – Part B
Task Description:
Weight: 35 %
Marks out of
100 Criteria 7 6
17.5 Executive Summary of Part A of the Individual Report
You provide a comprehensive
overview of your selected
organization, background,
sustainability drivers, position
on the Sustainability Matrix,
recommended program and
value created from it.
You provide a mostly
comprehensive overview your
selected organization,
background, sustainability
drivers, position on the
Sustainability Matrix,
recommended program and
value created from it.
Your report shows evidence of
extensive, relevant research
and skilful synthesis of
materials.
Your report shows evidence of
comprehensive relevant
research and skilful synthesis
of materials
Your comprehensive analysis
is supported by ample, credible
evidence from relevant
corporate documents around a
cleverly designed framework
derived through high quality
academic research and
synthesis of ideas.
Your well-constructed analysis
is mainly supported by credible
evidence from relevant
corporate documents around a
logical framework derived
through academic literature.
You have skilfully scoped the
report to succinctly profile and
focus on trade-offs and
tensions in sustainability for
the chosen company. Trade-
offs in SDGs considered.
You have effectively scoped
the report to succinctly profile
and focus on trade-offs and
tensions in sustainability for
the chosen company. Trade-
offs in SDGs considered.
Clever links with your selected
organization, supported by
research have been skilfully
drawn from your
comprehensive analysis of
company information and the
academic literature to highlight
the trade off and tensions.
Your assertions are well
referenced with quality
academic literature.
Logical links with your
selected organization,
supported by research have
been clearly drawn from your
thorough analysis of company
information and the academic
literature to highlight the trade-
offs and tensions for your
organisation. Your assertions
are well referenced with
academic literature.
This is an individual assessment. Justify your analysis and discussions through relevant sustainability literature. Remember to demonstrate that you have understood the concepts we discussed
in class through the semester then applied them to your company. (2,000 words). 12 academic references minimum.
20
Critical analysis of your
company from the perspective
of the Ethical case for
sustainability and how the
chosen company must take
action or is taking action in
that context
20
Identification and analysis of
Trade-offs and tensions in
sustainability that impact the
chosen company at an
individual, organisational,
societal. Trade-offs in SDGs
considered.
Your report shows evidence of
extensive, relevant research
and skilful critical analysis of
the leadership and culture
influencing the chosen
organisation including details
and reasoning of its impacts or
further areas improvement.
Your report shows evidence of
relevant research critical
analysis of the leadership and
culture influencing the chosen
organisation including details
and reasoning of its impacts or
further areas improvement.
The critical analysis is clearly
presented, reasoned, and
demonstrates a knowledge of
academic theories/concepts
discussed during the course.
Academic literature is used to
support your reasoning.
The analysis is well presented
and demonstrates a knowledge
of academic theories/concepts
discussed during the course.
Academic literature is used to
support your reasoning.
The structure of your report is
very clear and logical.
The structure of your report is
very clear, showing strong
planning.
Skilful use of images and
visual communication
principles where appropriate.
Considered use of relevant
images and visual
communication principles
where appropriate.
The format chosen for your
report is professional &
entirely appropriate
The format chosen for your
report is professional and
entirely appropriate
7.5
Referencing
Has broad research been
conducted, in
order to achieve a synthesis of
personal
ideas and those of the extant
literature?
Have the researched sources
been
referenced correctly, both
within the
document, and in the
Reference List?
The writing shows a
sophisticated understanding of
the requirements of academic
referencing technique. All
sources are accurately
referenced, and quotes are
fluently incorporated. The
bibliography is formatted
correctly and evidences an
outstanding breadth of
independent research.
The writing shows a
highly developed
understanding of the
requirements of
academic referencing
technique. All sources
are accurately
referenced and quotes
are effectively
incorporated. The
bibliography is correct
and evidences an
excellent breadth of
research
7.5
Language/Mechanics/
Professionalism
Has the vocabulary and
expression appropriate for
formal academic writing within
this discourse been used? Has
the work been edited for lapses
in spelling, grammar, or
sentence construction?
The writing demonstrates
meticulous use of language and
a sophisticated command of
the vocabulary suited to the
analysis of your chosen
Company' sustainability state.
Expression is eloquent, with no
lapses in grammar, spelling or
sentence construction.
The writing demonstrates
precise use of language and a
well-developed knowledge of
the vocabulary suited to the
analysis of your chosen
Company' sustainability state.
Expression is fluent, with no
lapses in grammar, spelling or
sentence construction.
7.5
Structure of document Is the
writing a logical sequence of
ideas, organised into
paragraphs that
works to establish a clear line
of
argument for the reader?
20
Development of critical
analysis of the role of
leadership and culture in
influencing the chosen
organisation including details
and reasoning of its impacts or
further areas improvement.
5 4 3
You provide good overview
your selected organization,
background, sustainability
drivers, position on the
Sustainability Matrix,
recommended program and
value created from it.
You provide relevant overview
of your selected organization,
background, sustainability
drivers, position on the
Sustainability Matrix,
recommended program and
value created from it, but
lacking in scope or detail.
You provide little to no
overview of your selected
organization, background,
sustainability drivers, position
on the Sustainability Matrix,
recommended program and
value created from it.
Your report shows evidence of
relevant research and
appropriate synthesis of
materials
Your report shows evidence of
research but materials could be
better synthesised
Your report is poorly
supported by research
Your analysis is mainly
supported by credible evidence
from relevant corporate
documents. Your response is
well structured but lacking in
sophistication in terms of
degree of analysis.
Your analysis is supported by
relevant sources but not always
logically or may be lacking in
detail. Further academic
referencing is required.
Your analysis not adequate and
not supported by relevant
sources
You have appropriately scoped
the report to focus on key on
trade-offs and tensions in
sustainability for the chosen
company. Trade-offs in SDGs
considered.
You have scoped the report to
outline the most relevant on
trade-offs and tensions in
sustainability for the chosen
company. Trade-offs in SDGs
considered.
You have not effectively
demonstrated your knowledge
of the on trade-offs and
tensions in sustainability for
the chosen company. Trade-
offs in SDGs considered.
Logical links with your
selected organization have
been drawn from your
adequate analysis of the
company information and
literature (including academic
sources) to highlight the
strongest the trade-offs and
tensions for the chosen
company.
Links with your selected
organization have been drawn
from your analysis to highlight
the trade-offs and tensions
your organisation. Further
referencing and research were
required.
Your discussion of trade-offs
and tensions your organisation
for your company is
inadequate.
This is an individual assessment. Justify your analysis and discussions through relevant sustainability literature. Remember to demonstrate that you have understood the concepts we discussed
in class through the semester then applied them to your company. (2,000 words). 12 academic references minimum.
Your report shows evidence of
relevant research and synthesis
of materials into an acceptable
analysis of the leadership and
culture influencing the chosen
organisation including details
and reasoning of its impacts or
further areas improvement.
Your report shows evidence of
research but materials could be
better synthesised and analysed
in terms of the leadership and
culture influencing the chosen
organisation including details
and reasoning of its impacts or
further areas improvement.
The analysis is presented in a
satisfactory way and
demonstrates some knowledge
of academic theories/concepts
discussed during the course
and is often supported by
credible evidence drawn from
relevant sources.
Your analysis is partially
supported by relevant sources.
The structure of your report is
mostly clear and logical
The structure of your report is
mostly clear and logical
The structure of your report is
not clear or logical
Some use of images and visual
communication principles
Images and visual
communication principles may
be used but not to their greatest
advantage (some may be
redundant / poorly linked)
Images and visual
communication principles are
inadequate (or inappropriate)
The format chosen for your
report is appropriate but some
improvements would enhance
its presentation.
The format chosen for your
report is appropriate but some
improvements would enhance
its presentation.
The format chosen for your
report is not appropriate
The writing shows a good
understanding of the
requirements of academic
referencing technique. All
sources are referenced and
quotes are fluently
incorporated. The bibliography
is correctly formatted with a
good number of sources
The writing shows an
appropriate
understanding of the
requirements of
academic referencing
technique. Sources
are referenced and
quotes are mostly
smoothly incorporated.
The bibliography is
correctly formatted
with an adequate
number of sources
The writing shows an
inappropriate
understanding of the
requirements of
academic referencing
technique. Most
sources are
referenced and some
quotes are
incorporated correctly.
The bibliography is
correctly formatted
with an inadequate
number of sources.
The writing
demonstrates careful
use of language and a
developed knowledge
of the vocabulary
suited to the analysis
of your chosen Company'
sustainability state.
Expression is clear,
with no significant
lapses in grammar,
spelling or sentence
construction.
The writing
demonstrates clear
use of language, and
an appropriate
knowledge of the
vocabulary suited to
the analysis of
your chosen Company'
sustainability state.
Expression is
readable, with only
minor lapses in
grammar, spelling and
sentence construction.
The writing is not
readily
comprehensible, and
does not demonstrate
knowledge of the
vocabulary suited to
the analysis of
your chosen Company'
sustainability state.
Expression is difficult to
read, with multiple
significant lapses in
grammar, spelling and
sentence construction.
Your report is poorly
supported by research in the
development of the critical
analysis of the leadership and
culture influencing the chosen
organisation including details
and reasoning of its impacts or
further areas improvement.